I saw the section 6 comments. I hope that the software vendors take note of the comments. I also envisage it would be useful to have a comments box at the end of each section, for comments specific to that section. I would see these being more detail to the questions just answered.
Having looked at the survey I think that a feedback section at the end of every section would be very useful for comments appertaining to the section just answered. These comments could be most informative when read in conjunction with any results.
I particularly like the idea of noting potential issues and frustations at the end to the survey form. This hopefully will be used by the vendors when deciding how to enhance their products and give a warning to potential users as well!
Congratulations PP team! The survey (formatting) looks great! It’s much better than the beta versions we have been reviewing.
Just to clarify for all - this is a test run with the survey to solicit your input. Please post your comments in this thread after reviewing the survey (even if you dont have much to say). We need your feedback!
The survey responses from this test run will be deleted prior to the official implementation/publication, so dont spend a whole lot of time answering the survey questions yet!
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Does anyone have any last minute comments on the survey before it goes live? Speak now!
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
Bernard,
I saw the section 6 comments. I hope that the software vendors take note of the comments. I also envisage it would be useful to have a comments box at the end of each section, for comments specific to that section. I would see these being more detail to the questions just answered.
Hope this helps. Guy
Did you see the comment forms in section 6? Did you envision something slightly different?
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
Having looked at the survey I think that a feedback section at the end of every section would be very useful for comments appertaining to the section just answered. These comments could be most informative when read in conjunction with any results.
I particularly like the idea of noting potential issues and frustations at the end to the survey form. This hopefully will be used by the vendors when deciding how to enhance their products and give a warning to potential users as well!
Congratulations PP team! The survey (formatting) looks great! It’s much better than the beta versions we have been reviewing.
Just to clarify for all - this is a test run with the survey to solicit your input. Please post your comments in this thread after reviewing the survey (even if you dont have much to say). We need your feedback!
The survey responses from this test run will be deleted prior to the official implementation/publication, so dont spend a whole lot of time answering the survey questions yet!
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software