Looking forward to it, if we can help will do so, the problem previously has been with the productivity rates, has no factoring, and weightings. Factors should indicated the normal manhours required to do a specific job, weightings is dependant on where the job is being done, the specific skills available, however, it is a case of termonology, and the split could be even more diverse, so put your thinking caps on gentleman, and let us discuss the practicalities of life on a universal scale.
In fact, I will be teaching a graduate course for the next two weeks at the University of the West Indies/Barbados, and I’ll be eager to pass this source information (as well as other kind words about Planning Planet -- as a new member, I’m very impressed!) on to my students.
We have a huge (no, a massive!!) database of build-times and production rates on the PP server which are all tagged using an LBS - a location breakdown structure. This will let us compare and contrast what is happenning around the globe. Some of the numbers we have are really exciting and interesting.
In regard to organising a Reference Centre we thought it would be a good idea to utilise something along the lines of this test-page (see link below). We could categorise things using a number of headings and sub-headings (i.e. a WBS type of thing)
We could decide on categories and how we would organise any suggested topics, or sections....
The top level of the Reference Centre WBS could be along these lines...
1. Rates
2. Proceedures
3. Software
4. Tips & Tricks
5. Sample Programmes
6. etc
We can then organsie the controlled review and upload of the data we have, along with what is present on the web etc. We also need agreement on how best to present the data on the screen.
What do you think? As ever PPers, this will be developed around the suggestions provided by us all.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
It is very useful and meaningful for PPers to have such an excellent database.
May all the PPers contribute more infomation to upgrade the database system.
Regards.
Nice to see this Download Centre in TEST version.
This is time taken job and hope that all PP members will surely conribute to this SECTION to make it effective for evereyone
Hi PP Admin,
Good work, its really nice to have a download centre in order to get the following items as you have mentioned.
1. Rates
2. Proceedures
3. Software
4. Tips & Tricks
5. Sample Programmes
6. etc
under the software item, are you giving any access to download some software like P3, P3 E/C etc., for evaluation purpose?.
Let us see how it works............
Cheers!!!
Daya
Hi PPadmin,
Looking forward to it, if we can help will do so, the problem previously has been with the productivity rates, has no factoring, and weightings. Factors should indicated the normal manhours required to do a specific job, weightings is dependant on where the job is being done, the specific skills available, however, it is a case of termonology, and the split could be even more diverse, so put your thinking caps on gentleman, and let us discuss the practicalities of life on a universal scale.
Thanks for an interesting subject.
Tegards
PP Admin,
This is hugely exciting to me!
In fact, I will be teaching a graduate course for the next two weeks at the University of the West Indies/Barbados, and I’ll be eager to pass this source information (as well as other kind words about Planning Planet -- as a new member, I’m very impressed!) on to my students.
Hi PPers,
We have a huge (no, a massive!!) database of build-times and production rates on the PP server which are all tagged using an LBS - a location breakdown structure. This will let us compare and contrast what is happenning around the globe. Some of the numbers we have are really exciting and interesting.
In regard to organising a Reference Centre we thought it would be a good idea to utilise something along the lines of this test-page (see link below). We could categorise things using a number of headings and sub-headings (i.e. a WBS type of thing)
Test Pages
We could decide on categories and how we would organise any suggested topics, or sections....
The top level of the Reference Centre WBS could be along these lines...
1. Rates
2. Proceedures
3. Software
4. Tips & Tricks
5. Sample Programmes
6. etc
We can then organsie the controlled review and upload of the data we have, along with what is present on the web etc. We also need agreement on how best to present the data on the screen.
What do you think? As ever PPers, this will be developed around the suggestions provided by us all.
PP Admin Team