Numerous Amount of Positive Float
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
James Williams
74 posts
Abkar Bannayan
25 posts
christiandt
0 posts
J Vaartjes
3 posts
Aidar Kurmantayev
0 posts
Noe Radovan
8 posts
GeoVe
0 posts
Johannes Vandenberg
14 posts
Soheil Barekat
4 posts
Peter Holroyd
51 posts
Hi James & Rav, thank you for your respective input.
Ill do the checking now.
Highly appreciated.
best regards.
leonard
Raviraj is right. Also, check that links to successor activities have not been deleted or that those activities have actually started without the survey having been finished.
Its possible that the groundworks were logically linked in the baseline to start after the survey was 100% completed, for example, but that in the event they were able to start while the survey work was ongoing, either by reorganisation of the works or because the logical link was an oversimplification to start with. In this event it may be that there is no longer any successor activity contingent on the completion of the survey and the Float would extend to the end of the project itself. It should then be logically tied back into the activities that are still contingent on it
Just check teh end date of both the projects. Plz also check weather there any mandatory constrainst in the baseline program or not?
if end date has moved considerably, then TF is also going to get changed.
Cheers,
Ravi