I think Shahzads right. If a paper has already been published by PEO, there isnt a lot of point in publishing it on Planning Planet as well, when it could be reached just as easily with a link.
What might be an idea is to set up an index, within Planning Planet, of links to these papers which would be available to all PP members. Against each link would be a brief explanation of what the paper is about, if this wasnt obvious from the title. Eventually the index could be expanded to include links to papers from other sources which PP members had found. These additional papers could be vetted by experienced PP members to ensure that the information is sound, or that it isnt just something dreamed up by someone taking an ego trip.
Eventually PP members would have access to a large library of information without the PP team having to maintain it.
I think that technical papers issue on PEO should be limited to PEO not need to be published here in Planning Planet to avoid any duplication. Furthermore Planning Planet has already its own discussions on planning related issues in a better way.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Hi Guys,
I think Shahzads right. If a paper has already been published by PEO, there isnt a lot of point in publishing it on Planning Planet as well, when it could be reached just as easily with a link.
What might be an idea is to set up an index, within Planning Planet, of links to these papers which would be available to all PP members. Against each link would be a brief explanation of what the paper is about, if this wasnt obvious from the title. Eventually the index could be expanded to include links to papers from other sources which PP members had found. These additional papers could be vetted by experienced PP members to ensure that the information is sound, or that it isnt just something dreamed up by someone taking an ego trip.
Eventually PP members would have access to a large library of information without the PP team having to maintain it.
What do you guys think?
Chris Oggham
My oppinion is that PP can continue to be a place to discuss.
Technical papers could increase the dificult to mantain a site like this (maybe PP Admin could talk about this).
Regards.
I think that technical papers issue on PEO should be limited to PEO not need to be published here in Planning Planet to avoid any duplication. Furthermore Planning Planet has already its own discussions on planning related issues in a better way.
Hi John
Is it not best to leave the PEO with the technical papers.
As I would expect the same papers would appear on both sites - saves on duplication of effort
Regards
John