PP is a forum for sharing information and knowledge, with open ends. It is not a survey or opinion poll, for that we have another section in Voting.
You will appreciate that it is very easy to click and rate a comment than to dedicate time and energy and come up with something of value. It is for the originator to decide what he is looking for as an answer or the other partcipants who provide valuable input.
You yourself can understand that once a person disagrees with you, leave apart bringing the best out of you it may even stop anything which was to come out of you.
What is the difference between being criticised by a comment or a rating? Being right or wrong, I want as much feedback a possible. If anything, a system like this is likely to increase the quality of comments. This also removes the need to insert comments like ‘I agree/disagree’. A rating system would enable viewers to quickly give their opinion and move on.
As you point out it takes time and effort to produce a considered reply, and if someone makes that effort and then gets a bad rating because someone else doesnt agree with it, what happens then? The person given the bad rating is less likely to respond again especially if they are naturally shy to begin with. Continued bad ratings could lead to the person withdrawing from the forum altogether with the consequent loss of their expertise and experience.
Also where ratings like this are given, over time people tend to conform to a norm which can be implicit or explicit, but is usually a concensus of the opinions of the group, a process is known as operant conditioning. While ratings can be extremely useful in certain situations, Im not sure that Planning Planet would benefit from such a system.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Ashraf,
I see the merit of preventing PP forum from becoming a survey or opinion poll.
Thanks,
Larry
Hi Larry,
PP is a forum for sharing information and knowledge, with open ends. It is not a survey or opinion poll, for that we have another section in Voting.
You will appreciate that it is very easy to click and rate a comment than to dedicate time and energy and come up with something of value. It is for the originator to decide what he is looking for as an answer or the other partcipants who provide valuable input.
You yourself can understand that once a person disagrees with you, leave apart bringing the best out of you it may even stop anything which was to come out of you.
What is the difference between being criticised by a comment or a rating? Being right or wrong, I want as much feedback a possible. If anything, a system like this is likely to increase the quality of comments. This also removes the need to insert comments like ‘I agree/disagree’. A rating system would enable viewers to quickly give their opinion and move on.
Regards,
Larry
I totally agree with Chris.
Regards,
Ashraf
Larry,
As you point out it takes time and effort to produce a considered reply, and if someone makes that effort and then gets a bad rating because someone else doesnt agree with it, what happens then? The person given the bad rating is less likely to respond again especially if they are naturally shy to begin with. Continued bad ratings could lead to the person withdrawing from the forum altogether with the consequent loss of their expertise and experience.
Also where ratings like this are given, over time people tend to conform to a norm which can be implicit or explicit, but is usually a concensus of the opinions of the group, a process is known as operant conditioning. While ratings can be extremely useful in certain situations, Im not sure that Planning Planet would benefit from such a system.
Chris Oggham