Question about insurance liability - this one is only tangently related to our usual schedule items. I am looking at the “value” at bid time of the owner moving from a cap on liability for the contractor comparing 100% of the contract price on liability vs. 50% of the contract price. The question is: what, if anything, would the market dictate in terms of the value can I/they expect to yield in bids if we stay at the 50% cap vs. a 100% cap? Also if an unlimited cap (or no cap) if that helps answer it. I assume it might be more complicated than just comparing two quotes, particularly if you are not the one getting the quotes but have to make a judgement on values.
insurance liability question
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts
This is a question regarding the cost of risk.
From both the client and the contractor's perspective, the risk has a price, usually defined by insurance premiums and insurance excesses. A project quote will/should include the insurance premium plus the cost of a number of excesses expected to be outlaid.
Questions for the client include:
There is not 'right answer' to these questions and no way of knowing if the decisions made were optimum, even after the project is complete.
The question a competent contractor should ask is 'is the potential reward from this project worth the risk?'.
What has become apparent in the last couple of decades is the proactive management of risk by the client really delivers dividends; there is no such thing as a 'risk free project', and it is impossible to transfer all risk to other parties by way of contract: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-SCH-045.php