Opinions regarding the display of long lead items on a programme

Is it better practice to summarise long lead items in one summary bar at the top or bottom of the chart, separated from the construction activities or amongst the construction activities?

In my experience, putting the lead ins as line items immediately above the installation activity seems to throw some colleagaues as they misinterpret the procurement durations as being part of the on site durations for say the fit out of a particular unit; while others fail to pick up the long lead items at all if they are separated on the programme page.

S
Santosh Bhat 👤 Member for 21 years 1 month

Most Programmes are sperated into high level grops of such as Design, Procurement, Construction, Commissioning etc.

The long lead items sould exist in the Procurement area with lower levels of grouping typically by the procurement work package type, but potentially also by the discipline or location, or responsibile manager etc.

Z
Zoltan Palffy 👤 Member for 16 years 10 months

If you assign them to their own wbs it should not matter. At the top should always be milestones because they are the most important thnig.

Forum Sponsor

Top Posters

Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts