Change Order Impact Study

Hello,

In my project I've "revised baseline" Dated 31-05-2017 and "recovery schedule" Dated 20-01-2018, updates are applied on the recovery schedule. Now, I've few change orders that I need to study thier impact and decide the EOT the Contractor deserves.

which one should I use and why, the revised baseline or the recovery schedule?

Clarification: the "recovery schedule" has the same end date and budget of the "revised baseline".

 

Thanks

A. AbdRabou.

K
Kathy Castle 👤 Member for 8 years 1 month

Mike,

Baseline schedule lost its validity for that reason the client asked to create a recovery plan which takes place of the baseline. Once the recovery approved, it must be used as a new baseline because it drops past issues (concurrent delays, contractor caused delays etc.)

M
Mike Testro 👤 Member for 20 years 5 months

Hi Kathy
I disagree with your opinion that the recovery schedule should be used for the baseline in delay analysis.
It may just be a target programme set by the contractor to avoid LAD's.
Ahmed tells us that both the programmes end on the same date which means that the logic and/or task durations are different.
In any case any form of impact on a critical path will give theoretical results and should be avoided.
Best regards
Mike Testro

M
Mike Testro 👤 Member for 20 years 5 months

Hi Ahmed.
Which one are you using to monitor current progress?
A "recovery schedule" indicates that there are already delays on the project.
If you add delays caused by change orders to a programme already delayed by the contractor then you are giving him the benefit of his own delays.
This is always a problem when impacting delay events on a theoretical critical path which may be different in the two programmes.
If you use a Projected As Built method then the inherent problem is solved.
You can download the method from my website www.expertdelayanalysis.com for £35.00
Best regards
Mike Testro

Forum Sponsor

Top Posters

Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts