Contractor Delay

Member for

17 years 4 months

Thanks Mike...

 

Best Regards

Kannan

Member for

19 years 10 months

Hi Kannan

Yes - for work in progress.

For a forensic analysis you need to update the programme as well.

Best regards

Mike Testro

Member for

17 years 4 months

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the reply.

Is it wrong to use the Impacted As Planned in this case. The SD submittal can be incorporated in the baseline schedule showing the excat date of submittal. The Engineer's contractual review period and the additional 5 days can be included and further linking it to the relevant construction activity. This will give a revised completion date.

I think this can also give the EOT. Is this approach correct?

 

Best Regards

Kannan

Member for

19 years 10 months

Hi Kannan

So the Contractor takes responsibilty for the first part and the Engineer the second part of the delay.

The two events should be impacted on the date that they occured sepeartely so the each cause and effect can be measured.

The programme should then be progressed before each event.

Best regards

Mike Testro

Member for

17 years 4 months

Hi Mike,

YES, the contractor is responsible for the late submittal of the Shop Drawing. But the Engineer took more than the agreed contractual duration for review.

 

Best Regards

Kannan

Member for

19 years 10 months

Hi Kannan

Are you saying that the shop drawing was issued later than it should have been and that the contractor was responsible?

Best regards

Mike Testro