An example of the delays would be underground obstructions not known at tender and that did not show up during pre-excavation scanning. These obstructions subsequently required halting excavation then supporting the pipe/cable etc and this delayed the entire trenching process.
The client is not accepting that we did not know about the obstructions but their tender drawings did not show them.
There are two very good references you should examine, the first is by the society of construction law in the UK. http://www.eotprotocol.com/ and the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering.
Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 Forensic Schedule Analysis;
Neither are an easy read but well worth the effort.
There are two very good references you should examine, the first is by the society of construction law in the UK. http://www.eotprotocol.com/ and the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering.
Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 Forensic Schedule Analysis;
Neither are an easy read but well worth the effort.
Hope this helps
Chris
Member for
14 years
Member for14 years
Submitted by ma*****@r***** on Wed, 2011-10-26 09:49
The methods may vary but the concept is to determine the potential delay event/ fragnet which justified duration associated with it and it has to be impacted on the reference program used for claim presentation
Member for
14 years 6 monthsThanks MikeThis makes things
Thanks Mike
This makes things clearer.
Also Chris i got the AACEI document you suggested above, tough read but worth it.
Thnanks agin for the tips.
Aidan
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi Aidan The usual method is
Hi Aidan
The usual method is to insert a dumkmy activity that represents the duration of the delay event and link it to the affected task(s).
The delay event duration is from the day the event first raised its head to the earliest date that the affected task could have started.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
14 years 6 monthsHi Amit An example of the
Hi Amit
An example of the delays would be underground obstructions not known at tender and that did not show up during pre-excavation scanning. These obstructions subsequently required halting excavation then supporting the pipe/cable etc and this delayed the entire trenching process.
The client is not accepting that we did not know about the obstructions but their tender drawings did not show them.
Aidan
Member for
14 years 6 monthsThanks Chris I'll check into
Thanks Chris
I'll check into these.
Aidan
Member for
20 years 9 monthsAidanThere are two very good
Aidan
There are two very good references you should examine, the first is by the society of construction law in the UK. http://www.eotprotocol.com/ and the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering.
Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 Forensic Schedule Analysis;
Neither are an easy read but well worth the effort.
Hope this helps
Chris
Member for
20 years 9 monthsAidanThere are two very good
Aidan
There are two very good references you should examine, the first is by the society of construction law in the UK. http://www.eotprotocol.com/ and the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering.
Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 Forensic Schedule Analysis;
Neither are an easy read but well worth the effort.
Hope this helps
Chris
Member for
14 yearsHi Aidan, The
Hi Aidan,
The impacted delay causes how to reperesent in programme???Can you post any sample,please?????
Regards
Amit Kumar
Member for
16 years 11 monthsHi Aidan KellyThe methods
Hi Aidan Kelly
The methods may vary but the concept is to determine the potential delay event/ fragnet which justified duration associated with it and it has to be impacted on the reference program used for claim presentation
Cheer's
Shahul