It ok, you can keep asking question until the day you expire. Learning never stops. Chris can have 40 years experience in a particular field, and now he is practicing something different.
The foot print of the model that he is studying is 45x75 = 3375m2.
For a steel building, we still need to ask another 50 questions to come close the a good approximation of the weight per square meter. This can be between 30-120kg/m2 approximately. For example let us take 50kg/m2 x 3375 = say 170MT. This can be Engineered and Manufactured in 2-3 weeks and installed complete in 6-8 weeks. So you are talking about a complete job within 2-3 months.
For a concrete building, you have the vertical elements (84 columns with shear walls) this will take say 1-2 weeks, slab work for 3375m2 might take 6-8 weeks, and removal of shutter will take another 2+1 week cleaning, and you end up with a skeleton without the sides within 3-4 months time. Maybe less if you have the necessary formwork and manpower.
So time wise, if you have a scenario where a RC building can be faster than concrete building, I would like to hear it. In RC you need huge amounts of scafolding and manpower.
In addition to what Mike said, I would like to add that this is "Location" dependent.
I would suggest that you send out the same inquiry to 3 steel fabrication and erectors, and 3 Concrete General Contractors in the same area. They will be able to provide you with cost and time differences.
Generally if there is enough lead time for design and procurement a steel frame will go up quicker than insitu concrete.
Wrinkly tin sheet will go on a steel frame for an insitu concrete slab - usually the quickest combination.
Points against Steel frame include:
Ceiling Void Heigths for horizontal services
Fire Protection
Noise transmission
If you can ensure a design break between pile caps and ground floor slab then your steel frame can fly up and the GF slab can work under the 1st floor slab. (You didn’t mention a basement but this sequence still works)
Look out for lift shaft and risers which may have to be insitu concrete which can be slipformed if necessary.
I think that covers it.
If you would like to see a typical insitu concrete column and flat slab programme then email me at [email protected]
Best regards
Mike Testro
PS I have moved your thread to a more relevant topic.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Dear Anoon,
It ok, you can keep asking question until the day you expire. Learning never stops. Chris can have 40 years experience in a particular field, and now he is practicing something different.
The foot print of the model that he is studying is 45x75 = 3375m2.
For a steel building, we still need to ask another 50 questions to come close the a good approximation of the weight per square meter. This can be between 30-120kg/m2 approximately. For example let us take 50kg/m2 x 3375 = say 170MT. This can be Engineered and Manufactured in 2-3 weeks and installed complete in 6-8 weeks. So you are talking about a complete job within 2-3 months.
For a concrete building, you have the vertical elements (84 columns with shear walls) this will take say 1-2 weeks, slab work for 3375m2 might take 6-8 weeks, and removal of shutter will take another 2+1 week cleaning, and you end up with a skeleton without the sides within 3-4 months time. Maybe less if you have the necessary formwork and manpower.
So time wise, if you have a scenario where a RC building can be faster than concrete building, I would like to hear it. In RC you need huge amounts of scafolding and manpower.
With kind regards,
Samer
Hi Samer,
It is shown that Chris has 37 years experience in Design Related Planning (4 years more than Mike).
He should give us advices and not questions.
How could you say that Cost wise, RC Concrete is cheaper than Steel when Time wise you are going to finish longer when using RC Concrete?
All these things has to be calculated and concluded.
Best regards
Dear Chris,
In addition to what Mike said, I would like to add that this is "Location" dependent.
I would suggest that you send out the same inquiry to 3 steel fabrication and erectors, and 3 Concrete General Contractors in the same area. They will be able to provide you with cost and time differences.
But in general, the following might be correct
Cost wise (Cheapest): RC Concrete
Time wise (fastest): Steel
With kind regards,
Samer
Hi Chris
Generally if there is enough lead time for design and procurement a steel frame will go up quicker than insitu concrete.
Wrinkly tin sheet will go on a steel frame for an insitu concrete slab - usually the quickest combination.
Points against Steel frame include:
Ceiling Void Heigths for horizontal services
Fire Protection
Noise transmission
If you can ensure a design break between pile caps and ground floor slab then your steel frame can fly up and the GF slab can work under the 1st floor slab. (You didn’t mention a basement but this sequence still works)
Look out for lift shaft and risers which may have to be insitu concrete which can be slipformed if necessary.
I think that covers it.
If you would like to see a typical insitu concrete column and flat slab programme then email me at [email protected]
Best regards
Mike Testro
PS I have moved your thread to a more relevant topic.