Unfortunately, while Earned Schedule is no worse than other EV scheduling metrics (Schedule Variance and SPI), it does nothing to fix the underlying flaw in all such scheduling metrics: no recognition of the critical paths (both planned and actual). The result is that all these metrics are often distorted by float (both accidentally and deliberately!) and not only give a false picture but actually encourage out-of-sequence work, simply to enhance the performance to the metrics.
The solution is simple, but almost no one does it.
I’ve used Earned Schedule in all of my projects since I learned it, I love it so much that I can’t imagine working without it, and my clients are also happy with the results.
ES is not a requirement on Fed projects at this time. When I took an EV course a couple of years ago, the instructor was quite familiar with the shortcomings of EV indicators but he wasn't going to bring it up until I pushed him on it.
I started using ES in 2006, shortly after it was developed. The indicators were far more useful than EV and had a much more fruitful impact in highlighting contractor performance to Management. I applied the methodology on two large developments overseas with American prime contractors and local labor forces.
The book you want to read is Earned Schedule by Walt Lipke (available on Amazon). The website, http://www.earnedschedule.com/, has numerous papers and presentations that can bring you up to spead in a short time. Mr. Lipke advised me on my first implementation.
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
Thanks for the link, I’m familiar with DFARS as we operate an ANSI/EIA-748 compliant Earned Value Management System, but I didn’t think there was specific reference to Earned Schedule which was why your post caught my eye.
After skimming through the FAQs and Q&A, I still don’t see indication that the DoD requires further commitment to extended EVM theory beyond the 32 statements I’m already accustomed to.
A quick internet search will yield the following result.
Q&As Regarding the New EVM Policy from RDT Sessions:
The DoD EVM policy requires contractor management systems compliant with the ... a contractor proposes to use its EVMS to manage a DoD contract to which EVM is ...
Sorry to thread-jack, but a quick question for Samer regarding Earned Schedule and Post #2 in this thread.
I know Earned Value has been a requirement for Federal contracts in the US for some time, but I didn’t realise Earned Schedule was. When did this requirement come about? Is it recent?
There are many topics about earned schedule and EVA in this forum. You can check "Planning, Scheduling & Programming Discussion" and "P3-P6" categories.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
dear all,
i have make one of the great Graph for Earn Value
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:1015:]]
Unfortunately, while Earned Schedule is no worse than other EV scheduling metrics (Schedule Variance and SPI), it does nothing to fix the underlying flaw in all such scheduling metrics: no recognition of the critical paths (both planned and actual). The result is that all these metrics are often distorted by float (both accidentally and deliberately!) and not only give a false picture but actually encourage out-of-sequence work, simply to enhance the performance to the metrics.
The solution is simple, but almost no one does it.
Fraternally in project management,
Steve the Bajan
I’ve used Earned Schedule in all of my projects since I learned it, I love it so much that I can’t imagine working without it, and my clients are also happy with the results.
Regards
- Nader Khorrami Rad, PMP
ES is not a requirement on Fed projects at this time. When I took an EV course a couple of years ago, the instructor was quite familiar with the shortcomings of EV indicators but he wasn't going to bring it up until I pushed him on it.
I started using ES in 2006, shortly after it was developed. The indicators were far more useful than EV and had a much more fruitful impact in highlighting contractor performance to Management. I applied the methodology on two large developments overseas with American prime contractors and local labor forces.
The book you want to read is Earned Schedule by Walt Lipke (available on Amazon). The website, http://www.earnedschedule.com/, has numerous papers and presentations that can bring you up to spead in a short time. Mr. Lipke advised me on my first implementation.
I won't manage a project without using ES.
Dear Darren,
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
With kind regards,
Samer
Dear Darren,
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
With kind regards,
Samer
Dear Darren,
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
With kind regards,
Samer
Dear Darren,
The reason I mentioned it is that I took a course recently and the instructor emphasised that it is part of the Feds requirements. I have not worked a project that required it yet. I will keep you posted if I do so in the future.
With kind regards,
Samer
Samer,
Thanks for the link, I’m familiar with DFARS as we operate an ANSI/EIA-748 compliant Earned Value Management System, but I didn’t think there was specific reference to Earned Schedule which was why your post caught my eye.
After skimming through the FAQs and Q&A, I still don’t see indication that the DoD requires further commitment to extended EVM theory beyond the 32 statements I’m already accustomed to.
Regards,
Darren
Seems like Earned Schedule is an extension to Earned Value but not necessarily required when Earned Value is.
Make a Google search for Earned Schedule, you will find enough to drive you crazy.
WITWHEA = Well I thought we had enough acronyms.
BRR =
Best regards,
Rafael
Dear Darren,
A quick internet search will yield the following result.
Q&As Regarding the New EVM Policy from RDT Sessions:
The DoD EVM policy requires contractor management systems compliant with the ... a contractor proposes to use its EVMS to manage a DoD contract to which EVM is ...
www.acq.osd.mil/pm/faqs/faq.htm
With kind regards,
Samer
Hi Duy,
Sorry to thread-jack, but a quick question for Samer regarding Earned Schedule and Post #2 in this thread.
I know Earned Value has been a requirement for Federal contracts in the US for some time, but I didn’t realise Earned Schedule was. When did this requirement come about? Is it recent?
Regards,
Darren
Dear Huyn,
There are many topics about earned schedule and EVA in this forum. You can check "Planning, Scheduling & Programming Discussion" and "P3-P6" categories.
Regards,
Safak
Dear Duy,
This is a standard requirement for Federally Funded projects in the USA.
With kind regards,
Samer