Dave and Gary, thanks hugely for your input. Gary, I quite agree with you about limiting the number of separate forums on the same topic.
I also think it was right on to direct anyone who wishes to continue the discussion to do so in the Improving PP forum. I posted one more reply to Mike (this might be easier if the private message function worked); hopefully, the matter is now over and the thread can return to being on-topic.
I agree with Dave. I don’t think you should take it as a threat that he "won’t interfere in your discussions unless absolutely necessary". I think he’s just saying if this seperate forum did exist, then he wouldn’t feel the need to post requests for simpler language and concepts.
I think having a seperate area for ’high planning principals’ is an awful idea. The main point of a forum like this is to get the range of views from a range of planning proffessionals on each topic. to deliberately seperate planners into different forums ruins this.
I also find Mike’s implication that the rest of us are incapable of following an acedemicaly written post vaguely offensive.
I havent read it carefully but I think he was suggesting to have a separate forum for complex or advanced techniques and that he would stay out of that forum.
Its not a threat.
I dont see the moderators role as forcing people to stay on topic. He can create his own threads about different topics or different levels of complexity as can anyone else.
I take it you are objecting to his post where he wrote:
"What are you going on about. This high arcane textual gibberish has no place in day to day project planning.
The poor guy who started this thread just wanted to know how to generate durations. I tried to tell him a simple method and then you two are off with the fairies - or is that the Pharoes? Please in future employ the KISS principle."
Its not the words of a diplomat but I dont think its uncivil. Admittedly it is heading that way. Rule 2 also states "...derisive / condescending posts will not be tolerated". I guess some professional people dont appreciate their thoughtful detailed posts being described as "gibberish" from folk who are "off with the fairies".
He has applied to become a moderator. If/when he becomes a moderator he may need to take more care to respect other people expressing their views.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Dave and Gary, thanks hugely for your input. Gary, I quite agree with you about limiting the number of separate forums on the same topic.
I also think it was right on to direct anyone who wishes to continue the discussion to do so in the Improving PP forum. I posted one more reply to Mike (this might be easier if the private message function worked); hopefully, the matter is now over and the thread can return to being on-topic.
Steve
I agree with Dave. I don’t think you should take it as a threat that he "won’t interfere in your discussions unless absolutely necessary". I think he’s just saying if this seperate forum did exist, then he wouldn’t feel the need to post requests for simpler language and concepts.
I think having a seperate area for ’high planning principals’ is an awful idea. The main point of a forum like this is to get the range of views from a range of planning proffessionals on each topic. to deliberately seperate planners into different forums ruins this.
I also find Mike’s implication that the rest of us are incapable of following an acedemicaly written post vaguely offensive.
I havent read it carefully but I think he was suggesting to have a separate forum for complex or advanced techniques and that he would stay out of that forum.
Its not a threat.
I dont see the moderators role as forcing people to stay on topic. He can create his own threads about different topics or different levels of complexity as can anyone else.
I take it you are objecting to his post where he wrote:
"What are you going on about. This high arcane textual gibberish has no place in day to day project planning.
The poor guy who started this thread just wanted to know how to generate durations. I tried to tell him a simple method and then you two are off with the fairies - or is that the Pharoes? Please in future employ the KISS principle."
Its not the words of a diplomat but I dont think its uncivil. Admittedly it is heading that way. Rule 2 also states "...derisive / condescending posts will not be tolerated". I guess some professional people dont appreciate their thoughtful detailed posts being described as "gibberish" from folk who are "off with the fairies".
He has applied to become a moderator. If/when he becomes a moderator he may need to take more care to respect other people expressing their views.