I prefer to divide the complete manpower into three areas:
Direct
Indirect
Cost Centres / Rentals
The Direct manpower is assigned to the activity and hence the manhours are fixed i.e. they are based on production rates.
The Indirect manpower is time based and can be tabulated separately
The Cost Centres such as labour camps, production units, workshops etc. are supplying a service or a product and hence the manpower assigned therein is monitored separately. This can include the crane or other equipment operators if the rentals are inclusive of the drivers/operators.
The equipment assignment depends on usage. I prefer most of major plant and equipment in the common equipment pool as they work on more than one activity, such as tower cranes etc. The equipment for an activity should be assigned if it is meant solely for that activity.
With this categorization you can satisfy most manpower / manhours queries.
The second point. In Your schedule You will have two summary bars (hammocks or Wbs), one for all the time related items and the other for fix costs (independent from the time) that You will load all Your indirect costs (management, offices, etc )
About the second point I normally use to split in two. I assign the major equipment to the relevant construction activities (cranes, trucks, …) and the minor one (pumps, …) to the summary bar. This really depend a lot from the kind of construction You are doing. May be for You the welding machine is a key/major equipment.
About the first point, the people assigned to the project, are enough to complete it in due time? I mean the construction manager told You that he will employee on site not more of 3 gangs (for example) it is enough? This You should analyse and point out if the case.
All the info You have are also congruent with the bid?
I do not the Your case, but normally a Client will not accept Your baseline if the physical quantities, manpower and equipment hours will differ from the bid.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
A good stafing plan must be representative of field conditions.
the baseline will not change thats the whole point of a baseline
Dear Experts
I am making some modification / changes on my manhours (budgeted labor unit) for my current schedule (updated)
Do i have to do 2x modification / changes ; (1) in the updated schedule (2) in the baseline schdule
or i just make change in the updated schedule and the baseline will automaticaly change?
Thank u.
Pardon for the poor explanation
Similar Topic: Man Hours
Thanks Luca
Ok You estimate the hours need to install the 20” pipes as per productivity.
I suppose You have a resource man-hours in Your schedule and You loaded it.
In the same way for the crane You have to add a resource and load it, it could be number of cranes or equipment-hours.
The operator should go in the man-hours. You can not load the crane hours in the man-hours!
I prefer to divide the complete manpower into three areas:
Direct
Indirect
Cost Centres / Rentals
The Direct manpower is assigned to the activity and hence the manhours are fixed i.e. they are based on production rates.
The Indirect manpower is time based and can be tabulated separately
The Cost Centres such as labour camps, production units, workshops etc. are supplying a service or a product and hence the manpower assigned therein is monitored separately. This can include the crane or other equipment operators if the rentals are inclusive of the drivers/operators.
The equipment assignment depends on usage. I prefer most of major plant and equipment in the common equipment pool as they work on more than one activity, such as tower cranes etc. The equipment for an activity should be assigned if it is meant solely for that activity.
With this categorization you can satisfy most manpower / manhours queries.
Let start with the easy part.
The second point. In Your schedule You will have two summary bars (hammocks or Wbs), one for all the time related items and the other for fix costs (independent from the time) that You will load all Your indirect costs (management, offices, etc )
About the second point I normally use to split in two. I assign the major equipment to the relevant construction activities (cranes, trucks, …) and the minor one (pumps, …) to the summary bar. This really depend a lot from the kind of construction You are doing. May be for You the welding machine is a key/major equipment.
About the first point, the people assigned to the project, are enough to complete it in due time? I mean the construction manager told You that he will employee on site not more of 3 gangs (for example) it is enough? This You should analyse and point out if the case.
All the info You have are also congruent with the bid?
I do not the Your case, but normally a Client will not accept Your baseline if the physical quantities, manpower and equipment hours will differ from the bid.
my view is both direct and indirect labour costs be taken into consideration.
For plant cost, how about to work it out from its life cycle (ie inital purchase + consumable + periodic maintenance; devided by its life period)?