It is always unfortunate when people dissagree and can’t seem to get a resolution. Over the past months I (this is James typing this time) have had some severe, and I thought unwarranted, words fired at me for various issues on the PP. On more than one occaision I have thought about pressing the delete button on the network server.
It appears that you guys have fallen out big time over this issue and I am not experienced enough to offer a solution to the problem. The only advice that I can offer (if it helps) is to say that next time (and I hope that you both will continue to support the site in the manner intended) you, or any of us, can’t agree on an issue is to discuss it over the email in private, and then publish your findings or agreement to disagree in the relevant post. In this way, if one or more of you / us looses our temper it will not be shown to the rest of the PP group.
All I can say guys, is that ALL of you moderators have been doing a great job and I am proud that I am able to be participating in the continued growth of the PP entity.
The conduct of every moderator is an issue that concerns us (PP moderators) all. What exactly are we doing as moderators if not to ensure that the public discussion threads do not degenerate?
I had a valid concern and I posted it here in the private moderators forum, not the public forum. This forums purpose is for moderators to discuss concerns, is it not?
I would have posted a similar message here soliciting input from fellow moderators had I read a post from a member or forum guest that I interpreted as similarly sarcastic. If a consensus agreed, I would have edited the post and/or warned the author. However, you are a moderator here so I was able to direct my enquiry directly to you. Why this should put you out I do not understand.
Im glad that the anonymous forum guest did not read your post the same way that I did.
BTW, your last post is a perfect example of what I meant by "lashing out" - proof that it was not so unreasonable of me to have mistaken your intent.
Have you slipped all the way back to grade school?
I cant believe that you feel that you need to post a message to tell everyone that "Ron is being bad." You got a problem, send me an email. You want to "rat-fink," then send an email to Daddy.
I will not justify my "tone of voice" to you on any public message board. It is time for you to get a life!
I took that statement to be sarcastic in light of the full message (which I did not quote previously):
What a great idea; simply post a constraint where the logic fails to accurately reflect the real-world consequences. We could do that on all activities and eliminate all of those pesky relationships that only get in the way anyhow.
Perhaps I misread/misinterpreted the tone/intent your post - it is easy to do with text messages. It appears that the anonymous forum guest did not take offense, so it is a moot issue IMO.
What "lasking out?" Do you think that recommending someone to publish his experiances in a trade journal (which I read) is lashing out at them? Is it lashing out when someone nominates a movie for the Oscars?
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Hi Guys,
It is always unfortunate when people dissagree and can’t seem to get a resolution. Over the past months I (this is James typing this time) have had some severe, and I thought unwarranted, words fired at me for various issues on the PP. On more than one occaision I have thought about pressing the delete button on the network server.
It appears that you guys have fallen out big time over this issue and I am not experienced enough to offer a solution to the problem. The only advice that I can offer (if it helps) is to say that next time (and I hope that you both will continue to support the site in the manner intended) you, or any of us, can’t agree on an issue is to discuss it over the email in private, and then publish your findings or agreement to disagree in the relevant post. In this way, if one or more of you / us looses our temper it will not be shown to the rest of the PP group.
All I can say guys, is that ALL of you moderators have been doing a great job and I am proud that I am able to be participating in the continued growth of the PP entity.
More power to you all.
James.
Ron,
The conduct of every moderator is an issue that concerns us (PP moderators) all. What exactly are we doing as moderators if not to ensure that the public discussion threads do not degenerate?
I had a valid concern and I posted it here in the private moderators forum, not the public forum. This forums purpose is for moderators to discuss concerns, is it not?
I would have posted a similar message here soliciting input from fellow moderators had I read a post from a member or forum guest that I interpreted as similarly sarcastic. If a consensus agreed, I would have edited the post and/or warned the author. However, you are a moderator here so I was able to direct my enquiry directly to you. Why this should put you out I do not understand.
Im glad that the anonymous forum guest did not read your post the same way that I did.
BTW, your last post is a perfect example of what I meant by "lashing out" - proof that it was not so unreasonable of me to have mistaken your intent.
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
Have you slipped all the way back to grade school?
I cant believe that you feel that you need to post a message to tell everyone that "Ron is being bad." You got a problem, send me an email. You want to "rat-fink," then send an email to Daddy.
I will not justify my "tone of voice" to you on any public message board. It is time for you to get a life!
Hi Ron,
I took that statement to be sarcastic in light of the full message (which I did not quote previously):
What a great idea; simply post a constraint where the logic fails to accurately reflect the real-world consequences. We could do that on all activities and eliminate all of those pesky relationships that only get in the way anyhow.
Perhaps I misread/misinterpreted the tone/intent your post - it is easy to do with text messages. It appears that the anonymous forum guest did not take offense, so it is a moot issue IMO.
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
What "lasking out?" Do you think that recommending someone to publish his experiances in a trade journal (which I read) is lashing out at them? Is it lashing out when someone nominates a movie for the Oscars?