Sorry I couldnt get back to you yesterday; the system wouldnt allow access.
The way I tend to group-by, is by using the Text 1, Text 2, etc. columns - depending upon how many sub-groups you want to use. You can customise the title of the Text column via Tools>Customise>Fields.
In each text cell, you define the group name for the particular activity and then type it in the text cell. Do this for all activities. If you have thousands of activities, it can be a bit time-consuming, but technically it is very straight-forward.
Go to Project>Group By>More Groups>New, and there is your window to format the order of the Text column groupings. Having done it once, it’s surprisingly easy.
Please forgive if Im being a bit slow - but if youve used the grouping function before, then why not use it again? :-)
Youre quite right in that the use of the group-by function is a perfectly good way of achieving your objective. Again, it will give you a good visual. Ive used the group-by function quite extensively, so if further assistance is required, please feel free to ask.
I understand what you mean, but I have in the past used a grouping function in MS when applied groups everything together. You can clearly see where conflicts are occuring.
Please could you expand a little on your requirements.
As you are probably aware, the "conflicts" are usually ironed-out by applying appropriate logic whilst compiling the programme. Doing this, of course depends upon knowing what the task conflicts are likely to be in the first place. However, in most of my instances, I apply a filter to the task name. By visually inspecting the result you can see when, and how many of such potentially conflicting tasks occur in parallel. Be a little careful, though, because you can have lots of the same tasks running in parallel, but each at a low level of effort. As long as the sum of all the work does not exceed the resource availability, then you have no conflict.
If further clarification is required, or Ive misinterpreted your question, please let me know.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Julian,
Sorry I couldnt get back to you yesterday; the system wouldnt allow access.
The way I tend to group-by, is by using the Text 1, Text 2, etc. columns - depending upon how many sub-groups you want to use. You can customise the title of the Text column via Tools>Customise>Fields.
In each text cell, you define the group name for the particular activity and then type it in the text cell. Do this for all activities. If you have thousands of activities, it can be a bit time-consuming, but technically it is very straight-forward.
Go to Project>Group By>More Groups>New, and there is your window to format the order of the Text column groupings. Having done it once, it’s surprisingly easy.
Have a go!
James.
Hi Julian,
Asking the obvious I know, but have you tried using the online help facility to see if that will jog your memory?
Chris Oggham
Howzit James!
The problem is I cant remeber exactly how I did it last, as it was quite a while back.
He! He!
Julian,
Please forgive if Im being a bit slow - but if youve used the grouping function before, then why not use it again? :-)
Youre quite right in that the use of the group-by function is a perfectly good way of achieving your objective. Again, it will give you a good visual. Ive used the group-by function quite extensively, so if further assistance is required, please feel free to ask.
Cheers.
James
Howzit James
I understand what you mean, but I have in the past used a grouping function in MS when applied groups everything together. You can clearly see where conflicts are occuring.
Regards
Cheers!
Julian,
Please could you expand a little on your requirements.
As you are probably aware, the "conflicts" are usually ironed-out by applying appropriate logic whilst compiling the programme. Doing this, of course depends upon knowing what the task conflicts are likely to be in the first place. However, in most of my instances, I apply a filter to the task name. By visually inspecting the result you can see when, and how many of such potentially conflicting tasks occur in parallel. Be a little careful, though, because you can have lots of the same tasks running in parallel, but each at a low level of effort. As long as the sum of all the work does not exceed the resource availability, then you have no conflict.
If further clarification is required, or Ive misinterpreted your question, please let me know.
Cheers.
James.