Of course you can have difference between your baselinebudget,budget,budget at completion etc. I consider myself as a senior planning engineer and i understand it. But i see a lot of managers and planning engineers ho dont understand it or want to keep it simple because they have other tools for EV costcontrol or what so ever.
So when you want to keep it simple, make this values equal to each other so the number of mistakes will be less.
IMHO, the option should be "budget values". More, in a baseline I think the two should be the same, since you are not forecasting budget deviations from the very begining.
Budget at completion, is the value forecasted (in this case by Primavera) for the final activity cost according to your defined criteria. E.g. cost per day*remaining duration + actual cost to date or the sum of AC with a index corrected figure for the other part, usually 1/CPI or 1/(CPI*SPI) or some other variation.
I do not see why managers dont understand the difference between the two. If your budget is time dependent, and the schedule changes, final cost doesnt have to be initial cost and budget at completion is a form to estimate that final cost and its deviation.
Forgive me, Ive not quite woken up yet, and think I may have bird flu, but it sounds like your suggesting changing the budgeted and baseline budgeted costs to match the at completion cost?
Sort of defeats the object of EV, youll lose track of how much more youve spent than budgeted (youll end up with a CPI of 1, even if youvespent double the budgeted cost).
If management are having trouble understanding the difference between budgeted + at completion, tell them a story, ie:
I want to buy an apple a week for the next year, apples cost a pound, so Im going to set aside £52, this is my budgeted cost.
6 months later, Ive found out my greengrocer is a robbing git, hes actually been charging me £1.25 for my apples (I know this because my last 26 weeks worth of apples have cost me £32.50). He has promised however, that hell go back to charging a pound per apple for the rest of the year, my new budgeted cost at completion is £58.50. This wold give a cost variance of £6.50 and a CPI of 0.9.
Being a cynic, I would predict that the overspend would continue at the same rate, and my next 6 months worth of apples would cost me at least as much as the first, another £32.50 (you just cant trust greengrocers these days), so my Expected Cost at Completion would be £65 (giving a CPI of 0.8).
When u use budget at completon for earned value calculation your percentage (and your ev) will change when budget (at completion)changes. This can happen by a number of reasons and its not always what you wanted
Most manager find a different between budget and budget at completion very hard to understand so you can avoid alot of question by keeping budget/blbudget/budget at completion the same. I usualy do this by running a global change after each progress import and scheduling.
The normal option and the default one is Budgeted values with planned dates. The first and third options are concerning using current dates. The current dates options use the Start/Finish dates for an activity or resource assignment.
Meaning that if you chose to update using Duration %, the EV calculations will be effected by these options.
The at completion value, as I understand it gives the facility of recognising overspend on the partially progressed baseline.
Whether you use this facility depends on a number of things:
1) If your Primary Baseline (within the software / not necessarily a contractual baseline), was partially progressed when you made it a Baseline (otherwise you would expect the At Complete and Budgeted Values to be identical.
2) If the over/underspend on your activities is as a result of extra work that does not warrant a change in the plan.
To be honest, Id never use the at completion figure... if youve got extra work, put it in as a change and show it properly; if youre just overspending, then unless you want to brush the fact under the carpet by masking the figures in the baseline, you want to be tracking against the Budgeted Values.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Dear all,
Of course you can have difference between your baselinebudget,budget,budget at completion etc. I consider myself as a senior planning engineer and i understand it. But i see a lot of managers and planning engineers ho dont understand it or want to keep it simple because they have other tools for EV costcontrol or what so ever.
So when you want to keep it simple, make this values equal to each other so the number of mistakes will be less.
Kind regards
Henk
Your managers a lot sharper than mine... mine struggled with the concept of buying apples....
IMHO, the option should be "budget values". More, in a baseline I think the two should be the same, since you are not forecasting budget deviations from the very begining.
Budget at completion, is the value forecasted (in this case by Primavera) for the final activity cost according to your defined criteria. E.g. cost per day*remaining duration + actual cost to date or the sum of AC with a index corrected figure for the other part, usually 1/CPI or 1/(CPI*SPI) or some other variation.
I do not see why managers dont understand the difference between the two. If your budget is time dependent, and the schedule changes, final cost doesnt have to be initial cost and budget at completion is a form to estimate that final cost and its deviation.
Hope this helps to clarify.
Henk,
Forgive me, Ive not quite woken up yet, and think I may have bird flu, but it sounds like your suggesting changing the budgeted and baseline budgeted costs to match the at completion cost?
Sort of defeats the object of EV, youll lose track of how much more youve spent than budgeted (youll end up with a CPI of 1, even if youvespent double the budgeted cost).
If management are having trouble understanding the difference between budgeted + at completion, tell them a story, ie:
I want to buy an apple a week for the next year, apples cost a pound, so Im going to set aside £52, this is my budgeted cost.
6 months later, Ive found out my greengrocer is a robbing git, hes actually been charging me £1.25 for my apples (I know this because my last 26 weeks worth of apples have cost me £32.50). He has promised however, that hell go back to charging a pound per apple for the rest of the year, my new budgeted cost at completion is £58.50. This wold give a cost variance of £6.50 and a CPI of 0.9.
Being a cynic, I would predict that the overspend would continue at the same rate, and my next 6 months worth of apples would cost me at least as much as the first, another £32.50 (you just cant trust greengrocers these days), so my Expected Cost at Completion would be £65 (giving a CPI of 0.8).
Whats important (i think)
When u use budget at completon for earned value calculation your percentage (and your ev) will change when budget (at completion)changes. This can happen by a number of reasons and its not always what you wanted
Most manager find a different between budget and budget at completion very hard to understand so you can avoid alot of question by keeping budget/blbudget/budget at completion the same. I usualy do this by running a global change after each progress import and scheduling.
Kind regards Henk.
Thanks Mohammed Abo El Magd
The normal option and the default one is Budgeted values with planned dates. The first and third options are concerning using current dates. The current dates options use the Start/Finish dates for an activity or resource assignment.
Meaning that if you chose to update using Duration %, the EV calculations will be effected by these options.
Thanks Gordon and Steve.
Kind regards.
Marcio Eduardo.
The at completion value, as I understand it gives the facility of recognising overspend on the partially progressed baseline.
Whether you use this facility depends on a number of things:
1) If your Primary Baseline (within the software / not necessarily a contractual baseline), was partially progressed when you made it a Baseline (otherwise you would expect the At Complete and Budgeted Values to be identical.
2) If the over/underspend on your activities is as a result of extra work that does not warrant a change in the plan.
To be honest, Id never use the at completion figure... if youve got extra work, put it in as a change and show it properly; if youre just overspending, then unless you want to brush the fact under the carpet by masking the figures in the baseline, you want to be tracking against the Budgeted Values.
Just my opinion, of course, but Im right. ;o)
I think the earned value purists would suggest using the primary baselines budgeted values.
And what is the difference between them?