Can it be really applied at an enterprise level...
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
Nick Johnson-Pond
3 posts
sairedz25
0 posts
Ahmed Awad
2 posts
Syed Shoeb
0 posts
Vimukthi
0 posts
bal aji
2 posts
Lee Mallek
23 posts
Viet Tran
9 posts
Ola Gbotoso
0 posts
Jaturapit Multongka
1 posts
Rashid,
I agree, the possibilities for changing settings are a bit overwelming, However it allows us to adjust the schedule settings for every project at many levels.
Yes this can be problem, my tip is.
Make a template for yourself of all settings. every new schedules start with this schedule and from this point you can adjust to what the customers want. (this is how i do it)
Kind regards
Henk
Rashid
Were using Temaplay (have been told very similiar to P3e)in place I work and using/extracting enterprise data. Worked with P3 since 94 and would never want to go back to the master/subproject. Latest version replacing Teamplay/P3 (Primavera 5.0) is functionally a lot better than older versions. once you get your head round it things will be ok.
Your points
1.Latest version allows 5 different cost rates per individual resource i.e. same person can work on 5 different projects with 5 different rates.
2. Standardise on one or the other
3. Use project specific calanders. Watch use of resource dependant task types.
4. ???
5. Layouts can be global or user specific. At enterprise level projects if structured properly will fit into the global layout you want. Everyone can have access to Global Units.
Do you administer P3e?
Regards
Dougie