Democracy vs Totalitaranism
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
David Smith
4 posts
Peter Holroyd
51 posts
fridau
0 posts
Rahmat Hidayat
32 posts
pinoyplanner
1 posts
James Williams
74 posts
Saqib Ullah
1 posts
Luyanda Ndlumbini
2 posts
Jeff Waldrop
6 posts
Robert Roy
1 posts
As for you Bernhardt,
[edited by moderator]
As for you Ogham,
[edited by moderator]
As for you Andrew,
[edited by moderator]
Hi Vishwas,
[edited by moderator]
Hi guys,
You which all agree, to back totalirinism, why are you not talking about Robert Mugabe for instance? You guys talk about disagreeing with me, and are all in agreement with dictatorshop, however you have been proven wrong by the world at large. You claim to be some of the important minds is the world, however you disregard the worlds problems. Think for yourselves and stand by your ideas, I am not a Maoist or some radical thinker, just plainly a democratic person. It is interesting to see the reactions I elicited. You guys need to think a bit, as it seems you dont.
Regards
Philip
I agree with the majority, an even and reasonable hand is used by the moderators for the benefit of all.
As for the case Philip quotes (protected job) - I think the moderators should send him his comments as his thoughts are not quite my recollection of the events.
Hi Guys,
I agree completely with Vishwas and Shahzad. Any democracy has to have standards to indicate whether remarks or actions are acceptable or unacceptable. In society these are laws, in this forum they are the rules and guidelines.
The moderators who uphold these rules and guidelines have a pretty thankless task which, from what I have seen, they perform firmly without being heavy-handed, and impartially. I am extremely grateful to them for their hard work in a task which must at times be rather irksome and frustrating.
Chris Oggham
This sentence is comprehensive in its meanings:
"if somebody is not satisfied with the proceedings of this planet, he / she has all right to refrain from any involvement here."
So no further comments.
I totally disagree with Philip. In contrast to what he has opinionated, I express my gratitude and appreciation in putting together a great web-site like this as follows -
1. By allowing a free discussion forum within the normal constraints of proffessionalism and decency, the Planning Planet team has set an example of righteous democracy. Also, by establishing a web-site such as this, all frontiers have been erased and, "Planning is just a Click away"!
2. The fundamental principles of Freedom of Speech / Expression is encouraged here. This does not mean the web-site users have the right to abuse the Freedom of Speech / Expression of others. The PP team understands this and has laid down certain norms or rules to aviod misuse or abuse. Also, knowledge and experiance sharing is allowed but not misused / abused.
3. Planning is surely for "Thninkers". But, thinking is not necessarily limited to planning. You cannot put whatever you think here in this forum.
4. All Moderators do have names. It would be appreciable if the PP Admin highlights how Moderators are elected / nominated.
5. And, if somebody is not satisfied with the proceedings of this planet, he / she has all right to refrain from any involvement here (democratically speaking).
6. PP, KEEP IT UP!
Rgds,
p.s. - Have I appreciated u guys too much?
Philip, any posts which are in violation of the forum rules may be edited or deleted as appropriate. If you are finding that your posts are being censored, I would suggest you consider how they violated the forum rules first.
The moderators (including the PP Admin) are saving and reviewing posts which are edited and/or deleted. I can assure you that there is no "cowboy" moderator with an agenda against you.
Bernard Ertl
eTaskMaker Project Planning Software