Critical Chain Vs C.P.M

Planning, Scheduling & Programming Discussion
F
Forum Guest 👤 Member for 17 years 4 months
· Permalink

I attended a seminar on this (actually they were talking about the Protocol), when one of the speakers talked about what he promised was a better way of scheduling by using C.C.

I did a quick survey among fellow participants at the end of the seminar, most of them felt that the speaker was waffly and copied his notes from books.

Guys, dont waste your money on these seminar nonsense in future.



Paul Cunningham, Hong Kong/Singapore

B
Bernard Ertl 👤 Member for 23 years 6 months
· Permalink

The last time I read up on the Critical Chain method, the papers were riddled with jargon such as “evaporating clouds”, “self-reinforcing negative feedback loops”, “bad multitasking”, “leverage points” and “buffers”. What I got out of it after distilling it into laymans terms was the following (if I am wrong, somebody please correct me):


  1. Estimate tasks / activities without any fat.
  2. Create a well defined (well connected) critical path schedule where all logical (hard) dependencies are specified.
  3. Resource level the schedule.
  4. Add “buffer tasks/activities” (fat) to the critical and near critical tasks so that you don’t

    commit to the true (lean estimate) critical path. The fat will shrink as the schedule slips.
  5. Implement a feedback mechanism that keeps everyone informed of the progress and changing criticality in the schedule.
  6. Establish clear priorities. Ensure that workers finish one task before starting another.



Of the above, the only items that are specific to Critical Chain is the addition of the "buffer management", which to my mind is the same thing as float management in CPM except for the fact that you actually may build some fat in your critical path schedule.



Personally, I prefer to schedule without fat and manage the project to the most aggressive objective. It would seem to me that building fat into your schedule is just setting yourself up for Parkinsons Law, "Work expands to fill the time available."



Bernard Ertl

InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software

F
Forum Guest 👤 Member for 17 years 4 months
· Permalink

What I ment was, PMI seems to silent on this issue, or I have yet to read about PMIs stand on this issue, but if you go through PMI database about CC there is a lot of write up in PM Journal, Network and other papers presented at PMI fourm quoting the CC is better management system compared to CPM.

Check it out

Forum Sponsor

Top Posters

Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts