Level 2 or 3 Schedule

Dear All:

Levels for schedules/plans/programmes are just indicators of detailing.



Level-01 is the most basic schedule to get an overview of time span and important deliverables.(Most of the clients are happy with Level-01 schedule for tendering , so lets call it tender programme)---WBS

Level-02 is the extension of Level-01 with more detailing clearly indicating the delivery of each work pack. Usually submitted after contract award as the ’Contract Programme’ - Work Pack

Level-03 is an extension to level-02 for execution. Each work pack is expanded to planning pack.This is usually developed after level02 submission and start of execution.-Planning pack

Level-04 is the extension of Level03 . very extensive. Assignable activities. Can be used to extract ’look ahead programmes’ for a week. This is used to plan & track day to day or weekly progress.(to simplify lets say supervisors carry this plan!). Normally progress trackers will be developed based on Level-04 , since it has got each and every activity listed.With manhour/weighting for each activity ..its easy to track overall progress & productivity.



Cheers!



Sreejith Nair

This is the best site for getting publications for planners and schedulers without having to buy any books. Nice

Dear All,



I would like to start with this saying;

Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated. ~Confucius



Adapting Confucius’s wise words to our level 2, 3 , 4 …n schedules, I am of opinion:



Levels of schedule is really simple, but some team members insist on making it complicated.



If I can persuade the Client and project manager, and intermediate management of following: I would say:



I need ONLY three levels:



Level 1: no more than 20 activities including milestones



Level 3: activities representing important, significant, focal scope of work. You need a planner with the expertise in identifying these activities. First understand the work, second simulate the work process and extract the key activities.



Between these two levels, you use the roll-up function that any software has in order to inform different levels in the organization.



Cheers,

I am of Opinion



LVL 3 Schedule = Critical Path Method Schedule.



WOW



Project Lvl 1 =Client/Owner/EPCM Summary Lvl 1 Schedule



Project Lvl 2 =Client/Owner/EPCM Summary Lvl 2 Schedule



Project Lvl 3 =Client/Owner/EPCM Detial Schedule Lvl 3 With Critical Path



Project Lvl 3 = Contractor/Contractors Lvl 1 Summary Schedule



Project Lvl 4 = Contractor Lvl 2 Schedule



Project Lvl 5 = Contractor Lvl 3 Schedule Detial with Critical Path.



Etc.



I am sure there are a lot of people wo disagree with me but this is myt opnion.

Kieran

I forgot one schedule layout: EAS: Early activity schedule - i.e. all activities to be processed during the first two or four or six weeks, depending on project/customer.

Regards

Dieter

Cheers Dieter

absoloutly right.



One project one schedule



One schedule on programme



On programme easy life.



Not every one sees it this clearly. Why is that?



Where you from dude??



Cheers



Kieran

Kieran

you are absolutely right, these items have to be defined before a project or programme starts. Let’s regard a programme as to be a combination of projects with relations (relationships, common resources, budgets) in between. So this matter is the same for project and programme.

When you offer a project to a possible customer, you’ll attach schedules with a headline indicating the level (among others). In general customers want to check your standards/written procedures, e.g. for the different levels for time-reporting. So you show them. These standards must be distributed to customer, controlling, the team, i.e. all stakeholders.

Second step will be the contract where you’ll include a schedule. Last chance to define your time-related reporting is the kick-off meeting. If you’ll miss, advocats will already prepare bottles of champaign - or equivalent.

Our standard-layouts for example are:

Level 1: Contract milestones + 1 bar for each phase - i.e. one page A4/letter-format.

Level 2: L1 + critical path + important events, e.g. arrival at site for important long-lead items --> maximum 1 page A3.

Level 3: Detail schedule - size depends on project: size, time-frame, risk...

Level 4: Detail working schedule, e.g. documents, working steps for construction...

As you see, these levels are for different target groups: L1 for highest management, stakeholders, L2 for management, L3 for PM, team, customer’s controlling, L4 site manager, document control... Of course for a certain contract these standards can be replaced by different ones.

Important is: It is one schedule and all levels are created by layouts, using filters.

Regards

Dieter

Dieter



Nice side step there fella but a good website for information. But I have a question and not just for you but all planners out there.

Many different profesionals in many different projects have there own views on what ’a level of programme’ means.

Example: level one means big bars to show duration of project, level one means the clients programme, level one means design... level two procurement... level three you get my meaning I hope.

I get the feeling each project defines its own levels within a programme which is great but this is not always communicated down the food chain.



Stay with me people I am getting there.



Should it not be written down in the contract agreed between the client & supplier what these levels mean. My experience is, and that is usualy joining a project just about to go live, I have had no input into this and you get 34 chapters of waffle from the client about earned value and s curves and what they expect to see in reports, which frankly, to me means they’ve employed a lazy arse so called planner or they havnt a noodle on what a programe is.



Back to my disertation, er I mean reply, it shouldnt matter how many levels of programme you have as long as each individual within that project can relate to the information provided. Once you have his understanding then you can call them level 1, level 2, level 1.6m, so what I skipped a few.



Nos Da



Kieran

Thank you Dieter Wambach for this web site information. I have just had a look and it is very helpful.

Have a look here: http://www.planningengineers.org/publications/papers.aspx

the following paper: "Standards for the Levels of a Programme or Schedule"