FF Relationships

F
Forum Guest 👤 Member for 17 years 5 months
R
Ronald Winter 👤 Member for 23 years 6 months

[Mis-posting by Nestor transferred to this forum by Moderator.]



I think the usefulness of SS relationships needs no discussion.

There´s two situations in which FF ralationships are a must:

- When the succesor activity is shorter in duration than the predecesor.

- After the predecesor in a SS relationship has started, progress override breaks the relationship and it is left without a succesor, therefore it would appear to have a large float until the end of the project duration. An FF relationshio to replace the previos solves the problem.

N
Nestor Principe 👤 Member for 22 years 11 months

If the completion of two activities are physically dependent to each other then FF relationship is a must. Avoiding the use of FF and/or SS relationship would make a CPM programme easy to maintain when you status the programme.



Regards,



Nestor

R
Ronald Winter 👤 Member for 23 years 6 months

There are many reasons for using FF relationships. For example, such a relationship will properly show the effects of a delay to the predecessor on the successor activity.

Forum Sponsor

Top Posters

James Williams
74 posts
pennyu
0 posts
jaasland
0 posts
Doron El
3 posts
Erim INANC
2 posts
gorilpk
0 posts
Ricky
0 posts
pinoyplanner
1 posts
Siddharth Ranadive
1 posts
Aidar Kurmantayev
0 posts