Dear Planners.
What is the diffeerence between defining critical activities as:
1- Total Float less than or equal to ....(e.g zero)
2- Longest Path.
Best,
Moutaz
Dear Planners.
What is the diffeerence between defining critical activities as:
1- Total Float less than or equal to ....(e.g zero)
2- Longest Path.
Best,
Moutaz
Under reswource constraints and resource leveling it is stll flawed, even if you could make P6 to disclose reliable resource leveled float values.
This is so because Longest Path Theory was devised before CPM of the 70's. The workarounds cannot deal with more modern and advanced models (and a few old ones) that in addition to date constraints, multiple calendars and renewable resources also include leveling for consumable resources, spatial resources, financial resources and a long list of model enhancements not considered 50 years ago.
Have you ever wondered why the controversial AACE International Delay Analysis RP does barely mention resource constraining and gives no guidance at all with regard to this issue? Maybe they are so much into Longest Path that they can't see the forest for the trees.
Resource allocation can affect the results of a delay analysis, performing a schedule analysis without considering resource allocations may increase the owner’s or contractor’s risk of assuming delay responsibility which is not his or her fault.
its the LOWEST total float value.
the 24 could mean hours which would be the same as looking at it as 1 day
Hi,
In one of the programmes, contractor has made a P6 Setting for Define critical activities a longest path 24 hours. In the previous programmes he used different duration. what may be the reason for this. Is the programme acceptable. This is an NEC Contract.
I did awhat if analysis by defining the critical activity to 0 hour, the CP is shortened.
The Critical Chain is determined by Critical Activities, if the math is done correctly Critical Activities will have either a start total float or finish total float equal to zero. The manipulation that yields negative float distort the true float values, it is a mathematical algorithm that allows for the impossible, late dates earlier than early dates.
Critical Path calculations shall always consider resource constraints, date constraints and any other type of constraints, the issue is on using the right algorithms that yield correct early and late dates and not the impossible.
Calculation of Critical Chain shall always lead to longest path otherwise it is flawed.
Usually the flaw is on how most software handle date constraints when unfeasible, they distort the backward pass and special software or calculations are needed to do it right. It is fun to look at their selling of longest path as if Columbus just discovered America.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2013.13010
Understanding the Occurrence of Two Total Floats in One Activity and Schedule Crashing Approaches for That Situation
From: http://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/WhitePapers/WP1043_Critical_Path.pdf
From: http://www.ronwinterconsulting.com/Longest_Path_Value.pdf
remember the critical path DOES not have to be 0 it can also be a positiive or negative number.
so I can have the longest path thru the project with 10 days of foalt on it
or I can have a critical path wih 10 days of float on it also
the critical path has the least amount of float it can be positive, zero or negative.
total float is exactly what you would expect -looks at the total float field
The longest path is calculated by identifying the activities that have an early finish equal to the latest calculated early finish for the project and tracing all driving relationships for those activities back to the project start date.
Longest Path can differ from Total Float = 0 if you have multiple calendars, or hard constraints which artificially affect an activity's total float.