Kudos for a well written and nicely presented illustration of some fairly elementary concepts, i.e. filtering by MSP’s “Critical” flag and sorting by Duration – “…to help focus in on those tasks that provide the most promise for shortening your schedule….” You correctly note (at the end of your article), “Be mindful that shortening critical tasks could change the critical path, and some previously non-critical tasks may become critical.” No doubt some PP members who are new to the world of scheduling or to MSP in particular will find your suggestions useful.
I think it’s important to note some of the key limitations:
1. MSP’s “Critical” flag is 100% determined by a task’s computed Total Slack, but Total Slack is an unreliable indicator of the true critical path in the presence of variable task calendars, finish constraints/deadlines, and (of course) resource leveling.
2. As most experienced planners know, the maximum amount of schedule compression that can be achieved from any given task is often limited by the existence of parallel, near-critical paths, which can be hard to decipher in MSP. The Duration DRAG of a task accounts for this limitation and may present a better focus (for crashing) than Duration alone - especially for projects that have already been heavily crashed, with multiple near-critical paths.
Overcoming either of these limitations requires the use of third-party tools (i.e. Add-ins.)
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Thanks Tom for the positive feedback and the notes that you mentioned. I will update our articel to reflect them.
Thanks again - Emily
Hi Emily,
Kudos for a well written and nicely presented illustration of some fairly elementary concepts, i.e. filtering by MSP’s “Critical” flag and sorting by Duration – “…to help focus in on those tasks that provide the most promise for shortening your schedule….” You correctly note (at the end of your article), “Be mindful that shortening critical tasks could change the critical path, and some previously non-critical tasks may become critical.” No doubt some PP members who are new to the world of scheduling or to MSP in particular will find your suggestions useful.
I think it’s important to note some of the key limitations:
1. MSP’s “Critical” flag is 100% determined by a task’s computed Total Slack, but Total Slack is an unreliable indicator of the true critical path in the presence of variable task calendars, finish constraints/deadlines, and (of course) resource leveling.
2. As most experienced planners know, the maximum amount of schedule compression that can be achieved from any given task is often limited by the existence of parallel, near-critical paths, which can be hard to decipher in MSP. The Duration DRAG of a task accounts for this limitation and may present a better focus (for crashing) than Duration alone - especially for projects that have already been heavily crashed, with multiple near-critical paths.
Overcoming either of these limitations requires the use of third-party tools (i.e. Add-ins.)