Concurrent Delays wrt EoT’s

F
Forum Guest 👤 Member for 17 years 4 months

Mark,

Thanks for your respond. Could you please provide the link to this forum?

M
Mark Lomas 👤 Member for 24 years 11 months

The Protocol has its supporters and its detractors. I think the SCL has its own forum dedicated to debating the protocol. So you may wish to browse the points raised there. Some of our own PP members have also raised concerns about the Protocol in these forums.

U
Uri Shachar 👤 Member for 23 years

Your interpretation of the protocol is wrong. In your example, the contractor would have been granted an EOT of 3 weeks, not 4 months and 3 weeks.

M
Martin Corkill 👤 Member for 22 years 11 months

No problem... it makes for some interesting reading... also has some good topics for discussion.

M
MK TSE 👤 Member for 24 years 3 months

Excuse me, may I know which web site can download the document.

Without reading the document, it seems there is some grey area. Like ’consolidated’ EOT or claim on dollar side rather EOT.

The practice, assess concurrent delay is a hardship. To identify which is the critical and all the associated influence. The ’which’ may be a breakdown of activity. Oh! much to discuss.

Forum Sponsor

Top Posters

Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts