Yes this both sensible and is also easy to do. I will action it tonight. Bytheway, we have had no replies from his email address.
Your suggestion will also force the user to use a verifiable email address. In 0.5% of cases we get an incorrect or "made-up" one which we have to chase-down and correct.
Real names must be the preference. I would not take too much offence to "Speedy Shagger", but does it cross a threshhold ? Where is the line ? Is "Stupid Twat" ok ?
Suggest we make a move on this NOW, before it becomes a problem.
On registering, on other sites they send an email with a link to be followed to "activate" your account. James, easdy to do for you ?
I agree with Bernard that we should encourage all to use Real names. If a thing is worth saying then one should be prepared to be identified. Use of nicknames, etc on a regular basis may only serve to devalue the real benefits of Planning Planet.
Not too sure how we would work a "being invited to join". I notice that as membership continues to grow we still are having people finding out about Planning Planet, who wouldn’t know someone to recommend them. I have mentioned Planning Planet at some meetings I have been to and for some people it is the 1st they have heard of Planning Planet. It is then pleasing to see that some of them find the site valuable and useful. Certainly an area that careful thought is needed in.
We have been watching his posts. He is based in Malaysia and his name (appears) to be Razif. We have sent him a couple of messages and will feedback if we get a response.
There is a real need for us to amend the sign-up routine in order to validate a member in some way. Some suggestions have been that we have to be invited to join the site by someone. Have not thought this through yet.
Spider Project is most functional and powerful professional project management software.
The first SP version was launched in 1993 and since then it has been constantly improved. Today is used in 34 countries though most Spider Project customers are in Russia. Spider Project offers numerous unique functional features and is the only PM software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios.
The unique features of Spider Project include Quantity Based Scheduling, Conditional Scheduling, Skill Scheduling, Optimal Resource, Cost and Material Leveling, Resource Critical Path Calculation, Cash and Material Flows Calculation and Management, Trend Analysis, Advanced Risk Simulation and Analysis, Calculation of Success Probability Trends, Calculation and Management of required Project Time and Cost Buffers, Application of Corporate Norms, Management of many Parallel Budgets, Multiple WBS and many others.
Spider Project was and is used for management of many large scale programs in Russia, including $51bln construction program for 2014 Winter Olympic Games preparation.
The application areas where Spider Project is successfully used include Aerospace, Banking, Construction, Defense, Energy, Engineering, Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Metallurgy, Mining, Oil & Gas, Railways, Retail, Shipbuilding, Software Development, Telecommunications, Utilities, etc.
P6-Auditor - Display information from Primavera P6 audit tables in a user-friendly format
Unifier-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Unifier
Unifier-Loader - Load data into and out of Unifier via Excel
PCM-Loader - Import data into Primavera Contract Management with flexible and secure, template-driven Excel spreadsheets
PCM-Archiver - Extract and archive important documents and attachments from Primavera Contract Management
PCM-Unifier Migrator - Automatically transfer live and historical data from Primavera Contract Management to Primavera Unifier with ease
Create Radically Better Construction Schedules with ALICE Technologies
Use the power of AI to create construction schedules that reduce risk while cutting costs and build time. With ALICE, develop the ideal schedule during preconstruction -- or recover projects that are off schedule and over budget.
Hi there,
We had a rude reply from his email address. He also posted several rude posts today. We have removed his account.
For your information, we think (but are not 100% sure) that he operates under ID 6511 M Razif M Rohaini
Sorry it took so long.
PP Admin
Mark,
Yes this both sensible and is also easy to do. I will action it tonight. Bytheway, we have had no replies from his email address.
Your suggestion will also force the user to use a verifiable email address. In 0.5% of cases we get an incorrect or "made-up" one which we have to chase-down and correct.
Regards.
Real names must be the preference. I would not take too much offence to "Speedy Shagger", but does it cross a threshhold ? Where is the line ? Is "Stupid Twat" ok ?
Suggest we make a move on this NOW, before it becomes a problem.
On registering, on other sites they send an email with a link to be followed to "activate" your account. James, easdy to do for you ?
I agree with Bernard that we should encourage all to use Real names. If a thing is worth saying then one should be prepared to be identified. Use of nicknames, etc on a regular basis may only serve to devalue the real benefits of Planning Planet.
Not too sure how we would work a "being invited to join". I notice that as membership continues to grow we still are having people finding out about Planning Planet, who wouldn’t know someone to recommend them. I have mentioned Planning Planet at some meetings I have been to and for some people it is the 1st they have heard of Planning Planet. It is then pleasing to see that some of them find the site valuable and useful. Certainly an area that careful thought is needed in.
We have been watching his posts. He is based in Malaysia and his name (appears) to be Razif. We have sent him a couple of messages and will feedback if we get a response.
There is a real need for us to amend the sign-up routine in order to validate a member in some way. Some suggestions have been that we have to be invited to join the site by someone. Have not thought this through yet.
Regards.