sample substantiation report
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
Julian Pegg
1 posts
Peter Nagy
2 posts
Raymund de Laza
17 posts
Syed_Asad
0 posts
Tony Greyvenstein
0 posts
Ahmed Al-Jubouri
13 posts
Umar Alvi
3 posts
Sibusiso Mahlalela
0 posts
Michael Samanyayi
3 posts
Simon Gumede
0 posts
Dear ravi
Thanks Ravi
I appreciate your reply. Do you have a sample report that u can share to me as a guideline. If you have kindly email it to [email protected]. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Den
Thanks Ravi,
I appreciate your reply. Do you have a sample report that u can share to me as a guideline. If you have kindly email it to [email protected]. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Den
Hi,
It depends upon which method u have chosen for analysis of EOT. Impact as-planned, as-planned V/s as-built, as-built but-for, collapsed as-built, time impact or window slice method.
It is necessary to focus the analysis on key areas of delay to avoid unnecessary expense. This makes the method iterative. It is not usually sufficient to simply compare the as-built programme to the planned programme without verifying the planned programme. It is necessary instead to prepare a construction logic which explains the sequence of events and reasons for the actions taken and the delay caused.
Also, you can highlight the events (By adding summary bars) in three ways:
- Delayed Events (Delay by client which cannot be mitigated)
- Mitigated Events (Delay by client but mitigated by contractor)
- Planned Events (New activities or variations)
The content of ur layout will change depending upon the method of analysis used. Apart from ur P3 programs and contract clauses, u may add the letters, ERIs / PMIs or RFIs to substatiate your claim, as that will be a key part of your notices sent regarding delays.
Cheers,
Ravi