SF

Member for

20 years 6 months

Hi Rashid,

I am intrested in obtaining the PDF file also, please send it to achebaro@qualitynet.net



Thanks



Eiman Chebaro

Member for

23 years 4 months

DEAR RASHID,



I WONDER IF U CAN SEND THIS PDF FILE FOR ME,

THAT WILL BE VERY NICE.



MY EMAIL : TOPGUNN77@HOTMAIL.COM



REGARDS,



MEDO

Member for

20 years 6 months

Thanks Frank.



I totally agree that Zero Free Float is very good and quite logical though it works good in schedules that do not require resource levelling. Try it with resource levelling and you would see that ’sprinkling’ will not tail follow ’rolling’.



If you know as to how i can attach a pdf with this forum posting, kindly let me know and i will attach a sample which would give you a better idea of what i am trying to say.



Best Regards

Rashid Iqbal

Member for

24 years 6 months

I would use a FS with ZFF (as late as possible) constraint rather than a SF. Due to the short activity durations in your example you are unlikely to experience the issues encountered when activities are executed out of sequence, the schedule is updated to reflect what’s happened and you get illogical dates on these activities. Having helped several planners resolve this I am not a big fan of SF.