Asta Powerproject Member for 7 years 4 months Member for 7 years 4 months Submitted by annamalai87 on Wed, 2018-06-20 06:42 Permalink Hi Anel, The best Hi Anel, The best representation for what your trying to acheive is via a Cashflow S-Curve. Example below. (Budget vs Actual vs Forecast to Completion) In your case the Target / Forecast to Completion cummulative value will be less than the Original budget. I normally export data from P6 to excel to do the analysis and display charts. [[wysiwyg_imageupload:5694:]] Hope this helps!!! Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2018-06-19 16:50 Permalink Hi AnelThe way you will save Hi Anel The way you will save money is by reducing the programme duration and thereby the site overheads. You can allocate a site cost per day on the overall summary bar and fix it as the baseline ost. Adjustments to the original programme will either increase or decrease the sumary bar cost which can be compared by two columns in the table. Trying to reduce costs on each individual task bar will not work. Best regards Mike T. Log in or register to post comments
Member for 7 years 4 months Member for 7 years 4 months Submitted by annamalai87 on Wed, 2018-06-20 06:42 Permalink Hi Anel, The best Hi Anel, The best representation for what your trying to acheive is via a Cashflow S-Curve. Example below. (Budget vs Actual vs Forecast to Completion) In your case the Target / Forecast to Completion cummulative value will be less than the Original budget. I normally export data from P6 to excel to do the analysis and display charts. [[wysiwyg_imageupload:5694:]] Hope this helps!!!
Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2018-06-19 16:50 Permalink Hi AnelThe way you will save Hi Anel The way you will save money is by reducing the programme duration and thereby the site overheads. You can allocate a site cost per day on the overall summary bar and fix it as the baseline ost. Adjustments to the original programme will either increase or decrease the sumary bar cost which can be compared by two columns in the table. Trying to reduce costs on each individual task bar will not work. Best regards Mike T.
Member for
7 years 4 monthsHi Anel, The best
Hi Anel,
The best representation for what your trying to acheive is via a Cashflow S-Curve. Example below. (Budget vs Actual vs Forecast to Completion)
In your case the Target / Forecast to Completion cummulative value will be less than the Original budget.
I normally export data from P6 to excel to do the analysis and display charts.
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:5694:]]
Hope this helps!!!
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi AnelThe way you will save
Hi Anel
The way you will save money is by reducing the programme duration and thereby the site overheads.
You can allocate a site cost per day on the overall summary bar and fix it as the baseline ost.
Adjustments to the original programme will either increase or decrease the sumary bar cost which can be compared by two columns in the table.
Trying to reduce costs on each individual task bar will not work.
Best regards
Mike T.