Asta Powerproject Member for 13 years 9 months Member for 13 years 9 months Submitted by Ben Taunt on Wed, 2018-02-07 12:33 Permalink And don't forget the new "EVA And don't forget the new "EVA Reporter" export tool, which has superseded the older Progress Expert macro and is now included in all versions from 14 onwards... Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2018-02-06 08:49 Permalink Hi PaulCan be cost but the Hi Paul Can be cost but the better measure is resource hours or even labour costs. days progress. Another is planned days progress over actual Expenditure of cost is not a true reflection of progress. I call this the Golden Tap Syndrome - A gold tap costs 100 time a chrome one and takes the same time to fit. Best regards Mike T. Member for 8 years 4 months Member for 8 years 4 months Submitted by Kokane 01 on Mon, 2018-02-05 21:57 Permalink Thanks mike, is this done Thanks mike, is this done through the resource graphs set as cost centres? Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Mon, 2018-02-05 10:29 Permalink Hi PaulYou can set up any Hi Paul You can set up any histgrams comparing planned with actual with a multiple set of data. The graphs though are better presented on a spreadsheet when the data is exported. Best regards Mike Testro Log in or register to post comments
Member for 13 years 9 months Member for 13 years 9 months Submitted by Ben Taunt on Wed, 2018-02-07 12:33 Permalink And don't forget the new "EVA And don't forget the new "EVA Reporter" export tool, which has superseded the older Progress Expert macro and is now included in all versions from 14 onwards...
Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2018-02-06 08:49 Permalink Hi PaulCan be cost but the Hi Paul Can be cost but the better measure is resource hours or even labour costs. days progress. Another is planned days progress over actual Expenditure of cost is not a true reflection of progress. I call this the Golden Tap Syndrome - A gold tap costs 100 time a chrome one and takes the same time to fit. Best regards Mike T.
Member for 8 years 4 months Member for 8 years 4 months Submitted by Kokane 01 on Mon, 2018-02-05 21:57 Permalink Thanks mike, is this done Thanks mike, is this done through the resource graphs set as cost centres?
Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Mon, 2018-02-05 10:29 Permalink Hi PaulYou can set up any Hi Paul You can set up any histgrams comparing planned with actual with a multiple set of data. The graphs though are better presented on a spreadsheet when the data is exported. Best regards Mike Testro
Member for
13 years 9 monthsAnd don't forget the new "EVA
And don't forget the new "EVA Reporter" export tool, which has superseded the older Progress Expert macro and is now included in all versions from 14 onwards...
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi PaulCan be cost but the
Hi Paul
Can be cost but the better measure is resource hours or even labour costs. days progress.
Another is planned days progress over actual
Expenditure of cost is not a true reflection of progress.
I call this the Golden Tap Syndrome - A gold tap costs 100 time a chrome one and takes the same time to fit.
Best regards
Mike T.
Member for
8 years 4 monthsThanks mike, is this done
Thanks mike, is this done through the resource graphs set as cost centres?
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi PaulYou can set up any
Hi Paul
You can set up any histgrams comparing planned with actual with a multiple set of data.
The graphs though are better presented on a spreadsheet when the data is exported.
Best regards
Mike Testro