I think that WBS was developed to help project managers to at least be able summarize large project data. WBS provides only one way to look at the project.
However, with the advent of computerized project management software, PMs dont have to be limited anymore to just one perspective. And P3 uses Activity Codes so that you can slice and dice information in many many ways... by activity codes, project codes, resources, time, float, etc. Imagine if you needed to do this manually?
I would always recommend the use of Activity Codes becauase filtering, grouping and summaryzing, and performing global change is much easier this way... plus the fact that I can view project information in countless perspectives which can be saved in different layouts.
Jorge
Crown Systems (Philippines)
Member for
22 years 10 months
Member for22 years10 months
Submitted by Tara Muddappa on Thu, 2003-01-30 07:54
The way I view is to have WBS structured the way you build the Job.On the other hand activity coding gives you ample flexibility to view the reports of your choice.
Member for
22 years 7 monthsRE: RE: RE: Activity Code vs WBS field
Dear Eric,
Ive gone through your article. I must appreciate your efforts, well done.
Regards
Daya
Member for
21 years 3 monthsRE: RE: RE: Activity Code vs WBS field
Attached is the write-up by me regarding the Activity Code vs WBS. Please review for your reference.
Go to the
http://www.htcprojectcontrols.com/TTB2003-9.pdf
Also, you may find this is useful regarding Activity Code vs Custom Data Item.
Go to the
http://www.htcprojectcontrols.com/TTB2003-6.pdf
Eric Chou, PE
HTC Project Controls, Inc.
Member for
22 years 4 monthsRE: RE: RE: Activity Code vs WBS field
I think that WBS was developed to help project managers to at least be able summarize large project data. WBS provides only one way to look at the project.
However, with the advent of computerized project management software, PMs dont have to be limited anymore to just one perspective. And P3 uses Activity Codes so that you can slice and dice information in many many ways... by activity codes, project codes, resources, time, float, etc. Imagine if you needed to do this manually?
I would always recommend the use of Activity Codes becauase filtering, grouping and summaryzing, and performing global change is much easier this way... plus the fact that I can view project information in countless perspectives which can be saved in different layouts.
Jorge
Crown Systems (Philippines)
Member for
22 years 10 monthsRE: RE: Activity Code vs WBS field
hi,
The way I view is to have WBS structured the way you build the Job.On the other hand activity coding gives you ample flexibility to view the reports of your choice.