If it works maybe you can edit your bars to show criticality. Try with scarlet bar color to identify critical activities because of start slack while red for finish slack or start&finish criticality.
Keep in mind I do not have MSP so I am not able to try how it works.
Good luck.
Member for
16 years 7 months
Member for16 years7 months
Submitted by Gary Whitehead on Fri, 2013-01-11 14:39
Mike / DS Chan: Thanks for the advice. Setting the activity with SS+lag successor to ALAP, or adding an FF+lag relationship to force the criticality does indeed fix the problem (though at the cost of adding a constraint or relationship to the schedule which may or may not be true), but I am looking for a solution that does not involve making any changes to the activities -only to the way MSP calulates the float.
Trevor: Thanks for the offer of help -I've sent you the file
''SS + lag relationship'' is not a good pratice for programming, it consists of a open end for the predecessor activity. If use of ''SS + lag relationship'' as logic link, ''FF + lag relationship'' should also be applied for close the path. Please try and see the result.
Best Regards,
DS Chan
Member for
19 years 11 months
Member for19 years11 months
Submitted by Trevor Rabey on Thu, 2013-01-10 02:37
Member for
21 years 8 monthsI believe MSP calculates a
I believe MSP calculates a Start Slack field, try filtering activities with Start Slack </= 0 and/or Total Slack </= 0.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/project-help/start-slack-task-field-HP045335790.aspx
If it works maybe you can edit your bars to show criticality. Try with scarlet bar color to identify critical activities because of start slack while red for finish slack or start&finish criticality.
Keep in mind I do not have MSP so I am not able to try how it works.
Good luck.
Member for
16 years 7 monthsMike / DS Chan: Thanks for
Mike / DS Chan: Thanks for the advice. Setting the activity with SS+lag successor to ALAP, or adding an FF+lag relationship to force the criticality does indeed fix the problem (though at the cost of adding a constraint or relationship to the schedule which may or may not be true), but I am looking for a solution that does not involve making any changes to the activities -only to the way MSP calulates the float.
Trevor: Thanks for the offer of help -I've sent you the file
Cheers,
G
Member for
23 years 8 monthsHi Gary, ''SS + lag
Hi Gary,
''SS + lag relationship'' is not a good pratice for programming, it consists of a open end for the predecessor activity. If use of ''SS + lag relationship'' as logic link, ''FF + lag relationship'' should also be applied for close the path. Please try and see the result.
Best Regards,
DS Chan
Member for
19 years 11 monthsHappy to discuss it if I can
Happy to discuss it if I can see it.
send it to me:
trevor@perfectproject.com.au
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi Gary Try setting all the
Hi Gary
Try setting all the tasks to ALAP.
Best regards
Mike Testro