Thanks for this. We will talk to the legal boys and see what they suggest.
In addition...
We do need to sort out some content moderators / reviewers.
We do have controls in place to ensure that the changing of data is secure and that all data is essentialy non-deletable.
The Wiki has a robust change-control system in place, that keeps a complete audit trail of who does what etc. It also has an equally good revert-to-an-earlier-version function in case of damage by a member.
Thanks for this. We will look into it. Well spotted.
PP Admin
Member for
24 years 4 months
Member for24 years5 months
Submitted by Andrew Pearce on Mon, 2009-03-23 03:48
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: pp Wiki - Inherent Fundamental Problems
Thanks for this. We will talk to the legal boys and see what they suggest.
In addition...
We do need to sort out some content moderators / reviewers.
We do have controls in place to ensure that the changing of data is secure and that all data is essentialy non-deletable.
The Wiki has a robust change-control system in place, that keeps a complete audit trail of who does what etc. It also has an equally good revert-to-an-earlier-version function in case of damage by a member.
Thanks for this. We will look into it. Well spotted.
PP Admin
Member for
24 years 4 monthsRE: pp Wiki - Inherent Fundamental Problems
I tend to agree with Mike on this one.
The copyright issue is a particular risk to the website.
What we need is a way of storing/distributing usefull planning advice, programme templates, case studies etc.