Planning planet (pp.) is an active, especial website because of the transparency of each member of it, no boundaries between each other’s, visiting the PP site become my daily basis.
When PP membership will be paid subscription fees, I think some of the specialty of that will be missed in somehow, the freedom in adding any input will be adjusted and most likely purity of relationship between corporative members will be lost.
There are other suggestion can be a much helpful to apply subscriptions fees and it is making a sense:
adding an optional service depends on the member selection of having some of it, hereinafter there are some:
Providing specific and recommended books based on valuable advice from specialists in pp. crew to pp. member or even tutorials materials.
Providing a seeking help to find job.
Helping in way of build up a professional CV, s.
Providing structured advices based on member demands.
Organizing events overall the world with a professional team of pp such as seminars, trainings, workshop …etc.
All above proposed services it will be welcomed if it is being payable, but expect of that will not be recommended at all specifically in this times since PP. achieving a big onward steps.
Agreed, I dont think we should charge. This will stiffle the debate and put people off from joining.
There are many vendors out there, software, training, etc who could know doubt be persuaded if it is ever necessary to get money to maintain the web space, etc. Planning Planet as a voluntary unpaid for professional forum promoting activer debate among interested planners is an ideal forum. By being free we deliver a service that I have not come across with any professional body. To us Planning is the key integrating business of Project Mgt. This website enables the Planners of the world to unite, meet and debate.
Keep up the good work.
Guy
Member for
22 years 11 months
Member for22 years11 months
Submitted by Bernard Ertl on Wed, 2003-10-22 10:23
Google Adsense is a good content targeted ad system that could help defray the costs of maintaining the site with $$$ from Google pay par click advertisers footing the bill for any traffic delivered.
I want to exchange views with anyone and everyone, about all sorts of topics surrounding the planning/project management function, if subscriptions are introduced you will exclude a lot of people, which I didnt think PP was all about, it smacks of elitism, the smaller, less able guys not being able to be involved.
I, for one, would not use PP if subscriptions were introduced.
I know its not a demoracy but maybe we should take a vote on it!!
Sponsorship and advertsing ? Yes, as PP has a strong and focussed audience, some selected ads would be appropriate. This would be up to the PP team to implement. Given the growth on the site and traffic, where will it be in 1, 3, 5 years and will it be manageable as a free resource ?
Member for
22 years 11 months
Member for22 years11 months
Submitted by Bernard Ertl on Mon, 2003-10-20 13:05
Should PP membership be categorized according to experience?
My responses:
I am sure at some point the bandwidth from the PP site will require James to seek some monetary compensation to assist with the costs of running the site. Whether it be on-site advertising or user subscription fees. As I understand it, PP is very sensitive to allowing people to participate (anonymously - "forum guest") who have (company or national) political or other concerns that would prevent them from becoming a member. Requiring paid subscriptions would curtail access for these individuals. It might also discourage participation from company employees who cannot get their company to pay for the subscription. It could lead to PP being used only by consultants and vendors. I do not think this would be in the best long term interests of the PP.
There is no way that the PP team can audit the experience of every potential member world-wide. Currently there is a system in place based upon the honor system whereby members can identify their base of expertise. I think it works well and most members appear to have been very honest/modest in answering that survey. Members who post in the forums provide the additional "evidence" of their expertise (or lack thereof) for all to see. That said, I would not mind seeing a system similar to the one employed by Eng-Tips.com where members can vote forum posts as useful or "expert information" and some ratings can be derived to credit members who contribute useful posts.
Member for
15 years 8 monthsadding an optional service
The most things should be acknowledgeable:
Planning planet (pp.) is an active, especial website because of the transparency of each member of it, no boundaries between each other’s, visiting the PP site become my daily basis.
When PP membership will be paid subscription fees, I think some of the specialty of that will be missed in somehow, the freedom in adding any input will be adjusted and most likely purity of relationship between corporative members will be lost.
There are other suggestion can be a much helpful to apply subscriptions fees and it is making a sense:
adding an optional service depends on the member selection of having some of it, hereinafter there are some:
All above proposed services it will be welcomed if it is being payable, but expect of that will not be recommended at all specifically in this times since PP. achieving a big onward steps.
Thanks
Mai
Member for
22 years 5 monthsPaid Subs
One possible way of funding would be to charge recruiters a monthly fee for job advertisement.
Member for
24 years 1 monthRE: Subscription Fee
Agreed, I dont think we should charge. This will stiffle the debate and put people off from joining.
There are many vendors out there, software, training, etc who could know doubt be persuaded if it is ever necessary to get money to maintain the web space, etc. Planning Planet as a voluntary unpaid for professional forum promoting activer debate among interested planners is an ideal forum. By being free we deliver a service that I have not come across with any professional body. To us Planning is the key integrating business of Project Mgt. This website enables the Planners of the world to unite, meet and debate.
Keep up the good work.
Guy
Member for
22 years 11 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
Google Adsense is a good content targeted ad system that could help defray the costs of maintaining the site with $$$ from Google pay par click advertisers footing the bill for any traffic delivered.
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
Sorry for misleading. I means subscription will make the website quiet.
Member for
22 years 6 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
Who wants a quiet website??
I want to exchange views with anyone and everyone, about all sorts of topics surrounding the planning/project management function, if subscriptions are introduced you will exclude a lot of people, which I didnt think PP was all about, it smacks of elitism, the smaller, less able guys not being able to be involved.
I, for one, would not use PP if subscriptions were introduced.
I know its not a demoracy but maybe we should take a vote on it!!
Will
Member for
23 years 8 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
No subscription !! It make the wesite be a quiet place.
Agree on selected Sponsorship and advertsing. Banner at the top? Together with separate pages on brief and allow search from home page.
Member for
24 years 4 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
Paid subs? No thanks.
Sponsorship and advertsing ? Yes, as PP has a strong and focussed audience, some selected ads would be appropriate. This would be up to the PP team to implement. Given the growth on the site and traffic, where will it be in 1, 3, 5 years and will it be manageable as a free resource ?
Member for
22 years 11 monthsRE: Subscription Fee
You are asking two separate questions:
My responses:
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software