Schedule Risk and Schedule Risk Analysis Member for 15 years Member for 15 years Submitted by mikeprocter on Mon, 2010-11-22 18:31 Permalink Member for 15 years Member for 15 years Submitted by mikeprocter on Mon, 2010-11-22 18:28 Permalink HI, Does anyone know of a HI, Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts? Member for 15 years Member for 15 years Submitted by mikeprocter on Mon, 2010-11-22 18:28 Permalink HI, Does anyone know of a HI, Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts? Member for 14 years 11 months Member for 15 years Submitted by Damian Smith on Thu, 2010-11-11 00:44 Permalink Mike P Sounds to me like it Mike P Sounds to me like it is a compensation event or at least should be, in which case the target cost should change as a result. Also, take a look at the client specified risks, because if they are listed then you should be paid for them if they become reality. If you like, please let me know your email and I will get you to send me the documents so I can review it. Sounds like you need to action this quickly as it seems very unfair. Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Wed, 2010-10-27 13:09 Permalink Hi Mike I just googled this Hi Mike I just googled this on NEC3 Option C Option C: Target Cost contract with activity schedule In this option the Contractor tenders (or negotiates) a target price using an activity schedule. Each activity is priced as a lump sum and a Fee is also tendered as a percentage for subcontract work and for the Contractor’s own direct work. The initial target price is the sum of the activity prices and the fee. During the course of the contract, the target price is adjusted to cater for compensation events that are set out in the contract. Payment is made on the basis of actual costs with an incentive mechanism for the Contractor to minimise costs. Savings and over-runs are shared between the parties. The sharing of risk in the target cost approach is likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes. If these gravestones are a compensation event then you should apply for it soonest. It seems that the initial target price is adjusted on that basis. Unless you have accepted all underground risks. Look at clauses 60.1 (7) and (12) Best regards Mike Testro Log in or register to post comments
Member for 15 years Member for 15 years Submitted by mikeprocter on Mon, 2010-11-22 18:28 Permalink HI, Does anyone know of a HI, Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts?
Member for 15 years Member for 15 years Submitted by mikeprocter on Mon, 2010-11-22 18:28 Permalink HI, Does anyone know of a HI, Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts?
Member for 14 years 11 months Member for 15 years Submitted by Damian Smith on Thu, 2010-11-11 00:44 Permalink Mike P Sounds to me like it Mike P Sounds to me like it is a compensation event or at least should be, in which case the target cost should change as a result. Also, take a look at the client specified risks, because if they are listed then you should be paid for them if they become reality. If you like, please let me know your email and I will get you to send me the documents so I can review it. Sounds like you need to action this quickly as it seems very unfair.
Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Wed, 2010-10-27 13:09 Permalink Hi Mike I just googled this Hi Mike I just googled this on NEC3 Option C Option C: Target Cost contract with activity schedule In this option the Contractor tenders (or negotiates) a target price using an activity schedule. Each activity is priced as a lump sum and a Fee is also tendered as a percentage for subcontract work and for the Contractor’s own direct work. The initial target price is the sum of the activity prices and the fee. During the course of the contract, the target price is adjusted to cater for compensation events that are set out in the contract. Payment is made on the basis of actual costs with an incentive mechanism for the Contractor to minimise costs. Savings and over-runs are shared between the parties. The sharing of risk in the target cost approach is likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes. If these gravestones are a compensation event then you should apply for it soonest. It seems that the initial target price is adjusted on that basis. Unless you have accepted all underground risks. Look at clauses 60.1 (7) and (12) Best regards Mike Testro
Member for
15 yearsMember for
15 yearsHI, Does anyone know of a
HI,
Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts?
Member for
15 yearsHI, Does anyone know of a
HI,
Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts?
Member for
14 years 11 monthsMike P Sounds to me like it
Mike P
Sounds to me like it is a compensation event or at least should be, in which case the target cost should change as a result.
Also, take a look at the client specified risks, because if they are listed then you should be paid for them if they become reality.
If you like, please let me know your email and I will get you to send me the documents so I can review it.
Sounds like you need to action this quickly as it seems very unfair.
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi Mike I just googled this
Hi Mike
I just googled this on NEC3 Option C
Option C: Target Cost contract with activity schedule
In this option the Contractor tenders (or negotiates) a target price using an activity schedule. Each
activity is priced as a lump sum and a Fee is also tendered as a percentage for subcontract work and
for the Contractor’s own direct work. The initial target price is the sum of the activity prices and the
fee. During the course of the contract, the target price is adjusted to cater for compensation events
that are set out in the contract.
Payment is made on the basis of actual costs with an incentive mechanism for the Contractor to
minimise costs. Savings and over-runs are shared between the parties. The sharing of risk in the
target cost approach is likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes.
If these gravestones are a compensation event then you should apply for it soonest.
It seems that the initial target price is adjusted on that basis.
Unless you have accepted all underground risks.
Look at clauses 60.1 (7) and (12)
Best regards
Mike Testro