Slandering people in this way is spinless. either have courage in your conviction or leave people to get on with gaining experience and learning their trade.
Member for
22 years 11 months
Member for22 years11 months
Submitted by Bernard Ertl on Wed, 2003-06-11 10:31
IMHO, forums that allow anonymity (either through guest accounts or the use of handles) are never as civil and professional as forums that require people to identify themselves. Anonymity invites spamming and flaming.
People just behave better online when they are not hiding. Count me as a vote for removing the guest post privilige.
We do not approve of slandering people in this manner. We do not know if what you say is true or not and we find it interesting that both postings here have been made by the GUEST account rather than by people feeling confident enough to give their real names.
We have known some planners, working contract in this manner - it is frustrating, but we can never stop that kind of thing. After all, one of the main reasons for working contract is to allow us to get the most beneficial package. When one of these guys does this and cannot do his job - then that is a different thing. Rather than slandering people, is there no other method of sorting this kind of thing ?
As soon as time permits we will probably be removing the GUEST account function so that people can no longer post anonymous messages.
Member for
22 years 4 monthsRE: Fake Planner
I cast my vote not to allow Guests to post. However, I believe that we should allow Guests to read postings.
Jorge Taguinod
Member for
16 years 9 monthsFake Planner
Slandering people in this way is spinless. either have courage in your conviction or leave people to get on with gaining experience and learning their trade.
Member for
22 years 11 monthsRE: Fake Planner
IMHO, forums that allow anonymity (either through guest accounts or the use of handles) are never as civil and professional as forums that require people to identify themselves. Anonymity invites spamming and flaming.
People just behave better online when they are not hiding. Count me as a vote for removing the guest post privilige.
Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems Inc. - Project Management Software, Project Planning Software
Member for
24 years 4 monthsRE: Fake Planner
Team,
Suggest you edit the first post now to take out the guys name. Suggest you leave the thread for discussion on the topic.
Discussion on deleting guests access to post should be held.
Allowing moderators to edit any post must be a priority.
Mark
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: Fake Planner
Guys,
We do not approve of slandering people in this manner. We do not know if what you say is true or not and we find it interesting that both postings here have been made by the GUEST account rather than by people feeling confident enough to give their real names.
We have known some planners, working contract in this manner - it is frustrating, but we can never stop that kind of thing. After all, one of the main reasons for working contract is to allow us to get the most beneficial package. When one of these guys does this and cannot do his job - then that is a different thing. Rather than slandering people, is there no other method of sorting this kind of thing ?
As soon as time permits we will probably be removing the GUEST account function so that people can no longer post anonymous messages.
Development Team
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: Fake Planner
Yes i have come accross him i used to work with him swindon. a real chancer