ah i never thought of that and probably the problem is as you figured. one of the predecessors to the predecessor hasnt completed. it looks a bit like as shown below with Act 3 being activity of our interest.
Act1--FS+10-->Act2----FS--->Act 3
Act 2 has completed. Act 1 is still ongoing till 5-oct with +10day lag on the FS link which explains act3 being extended all the way to 2-nov even without a direct link i guess. In situations like these i do find the expected finish facility in p3e quite handy.
Member for
23 years
Member for23 years
Submitted by Steven Oliver on Wed, 2007-10-10 10:32
Member for
20 years 6 monthsRE: Suretrak progress query
ah i never thought of that and probably the problem is as you figured. one of the predecessors to the predecessor hasnt completed. it looks a bit like as shown below with Act 3 being activity of our interest.
Act1--FS+10-->Act2----FS--->Act 3
Act 2 has completed. Act 1 is still ongoing till 5-oct with +10day lag on the FS link which explains act3 being extended all the way to 2-nov even without a direct link i guess. In situations like these i do find the expected finish facility in p3e quite handy.
Member for
23 yearsRE: Suretrak progress query
Are all the predeccessors (and predeccessors of the predeccessors) complete. Is there some non-working time on the calender ?