I ONLY use two types of date constraints, the "Early Start" (which works as a start-no-earlier) and "Late Finish" (which works as a finish-no-)later.
1) These do not break the CPM rules
2) The more types of constraint you use, the harder it is to follow the schedule
3) Any type of real-world constraint can be modelled using one or both of these.
The Expected Finish constaint is a DURATION, NOT a date constraint. It has a "set it and forget it" functionality in recalculating remaining duration automatically as the data date moves which can be very dangerous to those of us who believ every actoivity should be measured each progress reporting cycle.
Member for
22 years 10 months
Member for22 years10 months
Submitted by Ronald Winter on Sun, 2005-06-12 12:16
Mandatory finish constraints do not consider CPM requirements. They force the activity to occur at that time, even if its predecessors are not finished. The activity cannot occur any earlier and cannot occur any later, even if it would be advantageous to do so. I always recommend that people do not use this logic-override constraint.
Mandatory finish constraint, or expected finish constraint or early finish constraint
My practice; -
Mandatory finish constraint - Seldom to use since the calculated float will be zero by this constraint, float of successor activities are affected and the scheduled picture may misleading by the "amount of affected float"
Expected Finish Constraint - If I cannot work out the duration of the activity by resource and quantity, this constraint will be used. Both quantity and resource are in flexibilty and hardly to set limit or forecast
Early Finish Constraint - This depend the programme structure, case depends on using Early/Late constraints. Anyway, all contract listed conditions like milestone, key date, handover dates, etc, they are constrained by this category
Member for
22 years 11 monthsRE: Constraints
Heres a related discussion:
http://www.planningplanet.com/forum/forum_post.asp?fid=1&Cat=2&Top=9096
Bernard Ertl
eTaskMaker Project Planning Software
Member for
20 years 5 monthsRE: Constraints
Thanks Guys for ur time
Member for
21 yearsRE: Constraints
I ONLY use two types of date constraints, the "Early Start" (which works as a start-no-earlier) and "Late Finish" (which works as a finish-no-)later.
1) These do not break the CPM rules
2) The more types of constraint you use, the harder it is to follow the schedule
3) Any type of real-world constraint can be modelled using one or both of these.
The Expected Finish constaint is a DURATION, NOT a date constraint. It has a "set it and forget it" functionality in recalculating remaining duration automatically as the data date moves which can be very dangerous to those of us who believ every actoivity should be measured each progress reporting cycle.
Member for
22 years 10 monthsRE: Constraints
Mandatory finish constraints do not consider CPM requirements. They force the activity to occur at that time, even if its predecessors are not finished. The activity cannot occur any earlier and cannot occur any later, even if it would be advantageous to do so. I always recommend that people do not use this logic-override constraint.
Member for
23 years 8 monthsRE: Constraints
Mandatory finish constraint, or expected finish constraint or early finish constraint
My practice; -
Mandatory finish constraint - Seldom to use since the calculated float will be zero by this constraint, float of successor activities are affected and the scheduled picture may misleading by the "amount of affected float"
Expected Finish Constraint - If I cannot work out the duration of the activity by resource and quantity, this constraint will be used. Both quantity and resource are in flexibilty and hardly to set limit or forecast
Early Finish Constraint - This depend the programme structure, case depends on using Early/Late constraints. Anyway, all contract listed conditions like milestone, key date, handover dates, etc, they are constrained by this category