So Only if the scope is increased or as You have said if the instruction to reduce was given late and then their is a change in design which will delay the construction then this case is applicable for EOT.
One thing is certain and that is the completion date cannot be reducedd.
There may be scope for an EoT if the instruction to switch from 4 to 3 pipelines was issued late.
You may have scope for a rate increase if the cost of fixed price equipment is not covered on 3 pipelines when it was deployed for 4. This would be applicable for both onshore and offshore pipes.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
16 years 7 months
Member for16 years7 months
Submitted by Gary Whitehead on Fri, 2017-04-07 11:21
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi JithinThere may be many
Hi Jithin
There may be many more delay events that are involved - only you will know if there are any.
Gary and I have given you two possible examples to look for - you have to find them.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
14 years 7 monthsOk Mike and Gary, So Only if
Ok Mike and Gary,
So Only if the scope is increased or as You have said if the instruction to reduce was given late and then their is a change in design which will delay the construction then this case is applicable for EOT.
Regards
Jithin
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi JithinOne thing is certain
Hi Jithin
One thing is certain and that is the completion date cannot be reducedd.
There may be scope for an EoT if the instruction to switch from 4 to 3 pipelines was issued late.
You may have scope for a rate increase if the cost of fixed price equipment is not covered on 3 pipelines when it was deployed for 4. This would be applicable for both onshore and offshore pipes.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
16 years 7 monthsPossibly if the change from
Possibly if the change from 4 weels to 3 required some redesign of the pipework which delayed construction there might be a case for EOT.
But other than that, I can't see a valid claim.