Forensic Claims Analysis Member for 17 years 4 months Member for 17 years 5 months Submitted by Kannan CP on Wed, 2015-03-18 17:23 Permalink Thanks Mike Thanks Mike Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2015-03-17 16:48 Permalink Hi KannanWhat you have Hi Kannan What you have described is the difference between prolongation and disruption. Not everybody understands this. Time and money are separate entities and you do not need an extension of time to claim disruption. So - If the employer has by his action or inaction caused the contractor to deploy resources inefficiently then the contractor is to be compensated. Best regards Mike Testro Log in or register to post comments
Member for 17 years 4 months Member for 17 years 5 months Submitted by Kannan CP on Wed, 2015-03-18 17:23 Permalink Thanks Mike Thanks Mike
Member for 19 years 10 months Member for 19 years 10 months Submitted by Mike Testro on Tue, 2015-03-17 16:48 Permalink Hi KannanWhat you have Hi Kannan What you have described is the difference between prolongation and disruption. Not everybody understands this. Time and money are separate entities and you do not need an extension of time to claim disruption. So - If the employer has by his action or inaction caused the contractor to deploy resources inefficiently then the contractor is to be compensated. Best regards Mike Testro
Member for
17 years 4 monthsThanks Mike
Thanks Mike
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi KannanWhat you have
Hi Kannan
What you have described is the difference between prolongation and disruption.
Not everybody understands this.
Time and money are separate entities and you do not need an extension of time to claim disruption.
So - If the employer has by his action or inaction caused the contractor to deploy resources inefficiently then the contractor is to be compensated.
Best regards
Mike Testro