A number, assigned automatically to tasks when you reschedule a project, that indicates the logical path on which a task is located. Tasks with lower logical path numbers are those on logical paths that contain the least amount of total float; the higher the logical path number, the more total float in the logical path. You may find it useful to monitor tasks that are on low-numbered logical paths, as these tasks are more likely to affect the project finish date if they are delayed. Hammocks are always assigned a logical path of zero. The same is true of summary and expanded tasks, even if they have incoming or outgoing links.
Thanks Mike, but its a lenghty programme with a large number of different float paths. I was hoping to be able to provide full float paths from start to finish so that they could be prioritised. If I filter by total float and copy into a spreadsheet I risk losing the logic and if two float paths have the same total float it wont differentiate between them
Member for
21 years 8 months
Member for21 years8 months
Submitted by Rafael Davila on Tue, 2019-06-18 01:24
That many scheduling “experts” insist on longest path when it breaks for resource leveled schedules is beyond comprehension. I do not understand why an activity that belongs to the longest path is more critical than another activity that do not belong to the longest path but have smaller total float. The float path values do not represent a ranked order of criticality.
The longest path is broken when activities are no longer driven by relationships; that is, when activity dates are driven by constraints or resource leveling. Longest path calculation includes interproject relationships. Therefore, activities designated as on the longest path may change depending on whether you schedule a project alone or with its related projects. If a project has interproject relationships and you schedule it alone, the interproject relationships are treated as scheduling constraints.
With resource, financial, supply, space constraints the existing Longest Path theory does not work.
Total floats are useful and sufficient for understanding what activities require maximal attention.
Member for
24 years 4 monthsHi Chris,There is a function
Hi Chris,
There is a function called
Member for
9 yearsThanks Mike, but its a
Thanks Mike, but its a lenghty programme with a large number of different float paths. I was hoping to be able to provide full float paths from start to finish so that they could be prioritised. If I filter by total float and copy into a spreadsheet I risk losing the logic and if two float paths have the same total float it wont differentiate between them
Member for
21 years 8 monthsThat many scheduling
That many scheduling “experts” insist on longest path when it breaks for resource leveled schedules is beyond comprehension. I do not understand why an activity that belongs to the longest path is more critical than another activity that do not belong to the longest path but have smaller total float. The float path values do not represent a ranked order of criticality.
ORACLE what are Critical Path Activities?
With resource, financial, supply, space constraints the existing Longest Path theory does not work.
Total floats are useful and sufficient for understanding what activities require maximal attention.
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi ChrisYou can filter on
Hi Chris
You can filter on Near Critcal tasks by deducting days from the total float.
Just deduct days from the total float and copy paste the results to a spreadheet
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
13 years 9 monthsHi Chris,Is there anything in
Hi Chris,
Is there anything in the Help Files that assists?
http://help.elecosoft.com/powerproject/english/15.0.01/Content/Search.h…
If not, this sounds like a question for our support team so that they can discuss with you exactly what you're looking to acheive.
Cheers,
Ben @ Powerproject