Move part completed links - a blooper or magic?

Mike,



I am looking for the very basic PERT view where you communicate logic in a graphic way instead of prose. This is a functionality all software does have. Microplanner had both, activity on arrow (CPM) and activity on node (PDM ) diagrams, even better.



I am having some issues with the updating by percentage as this method I never use, I use remaining duration. What happens to your remaining duration as an activity is updated over several updating periods but with no change in % complete? What is the formula?



A feature to link around complete and / or part completed tasks sounds interesting. The problem is I do not have the manual to help me out figure out these functions and help is not there as in other software where at every screen or dialog box you have a help button that goes directly to where you are, not much of a help. You cannot even click on help without closing the dialog boxes, this is bad, no excuse, not a single bookmark.



I want to call to the attention that Asta Support is unparallel; they answer my questions even for a trial and even follow up. My criticism is in the hope registered users ask for improvements and Powerproject becomes even better.



Best regards,

Rafael

Another way to look for out-of-sequence is through the PERT view and Trace Logic Views available in most CPM software. You would see crossed out boxes for finished activities and visually can very easy pinpoint out-of-sequence.



Where Powerproject does provides for this very basic functionality?



Best regards,

Rafael

Thanks Mike.



If I were into house building I would give you 10ea P3 licenses for a single Powerproject license, here it shines.



Best regards,

Rafael

Mike,



Yes lead and lags is precisely where you will find most of your out-of-sequence. With bottom-up you do not have lags so it will happen elsewhere unless you are fooling the system by setting 100% complete to some of your bottom-up activities you assigned an “arbitrary duration” as arbitrary as lag. Even with only FS relationships and no lag you might get into out-of-sequence, just a change in course, “sh..t” happens.



Bottom-up after the fact, isn’t it what Powerproject pretend to do as if the answer for all out-of-sequence issues? Primavera and Microsoft guys missed it; guess you will call them rubbish.



I still want your answer about whether omitting from the out-of-sequence report these activities is a good idea.



Best regards,

Rafael