Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Revised Programme-Clause 14.2

1 reply [Last post]
Tue, 2007-10-16 05:47
Khalil Masoud
User offline. Last seen 16 years 10 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 19
Groups: None
According to clause 14.2, the Engineer can ask the Contractor to submit a revised programme if the actual progress doesnt conform to the original programme. I have two enquieries:

1) Is the new revised programme considered a "new baseline"? or we have to stick to the original consented baseline.

2) If the original baseline cannot be contractually chenged, how it can be used as a reference to assess claims even it is not doable anymore?

Thank you
Top

Replies

Wed, 2007-10-17 00:52
#1
Roger Gibson
User offline. Last seen 7 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Jun 2001
Posts: 71
Groups: Building Information Modelling
Khalil,

Presumably progress of the works is behind the original programme and in critical delay, and in the Engineer’s opinion the delay has been caused by the contractor.

You should submit.
1. A current progress update of the opriginal baseline programme, showing a new forecast completion date.
2. If you, the contractor, considers that all or some of the critical delay to the project completion date is the responsibility of the Employer/Client, then submit the necessary details of the delay.
3. Submit a ’new’ baseline programme showing a ’new’ forecast completion date. This will show a recovery of the critical delay caused by the contractor or the best-possible ’new’ completion date and accepting some of the critical delay to date.

Roger Gibson
Top