Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we deliver the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Using what you know now in prior period updates - acceptable?

1 reply [Last post]
John Reeves
User offline. Last seen 7 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 10 May 2013
Posts: 343
Groups: None

A procurement item is discovered to be taking 90 days longer than expected, you discovered this in March but you are updating February data.  You could and should revised that duration to add 90 cal. days, otherwise you are publishing knowingly wrong data.  Plus this did not happen in March - you don't when the equipment vendor started sand-bagging - probably from the start, so either way you should use the data you know now (not then) as correct for item?  correct? - it would be different if it were a work item that extended in March - and you found out in March.  Correct?

Replies

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 4 min ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5241

Using what you know now in prior period updates mean your updates are not contemporaneous updates. This might have some implications that can play against the party responsible for submitting the updates.