With concurrent delay, you get time but not money - but what if you need acceleration to stay on schedule? Do you have to pay them - why it was concurrent? Cannot slide such as you simply cannot let the schedule slide due to once a year environmental issues you have to fit into.
So with concurrent delay, you get time but not money - but what if you need acceleration to stay on schedule?
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
Soheil Barekat
4 posts
Luis Jr Ngade
6 posts
Ben Welsher
1 posts
Rohan Dashputre
0 posts
AMECHI ANAKWENZE
2 posts
Jayaprakash Sekar
1 posts
arash.karmand
0 posts
James Williams
74 posts
Vahidazimi01
0 posts
David Smith
4 posts
I did some reading, and basically if you have to accellerate in concurrent delay the contractor gets 50% of the accelleration costs.
John,
still struggle with concurrent delay - or is it pacing or parallel? Did you realise at the time what it was or is it just in a retrospective analysis being done by somebody who was not there? Did it change from period to period? As you say, did you mitigate by acceleration without realising it and now the clever people want to claim some money back?
Environmental work windows - given the way nature is changing a blanket stop seems out of date in the UK