Rolyn,

Yes, of course we need to have good assessment on the right production rate. Therefore both local and global knowledges is needed. However, if we only looking @ local rate, as a planner we will not able to gain the benefit for learning from others.

Like building a commercial highrise, in Hong Kong you can finish each floor per week. You may need four times as much in your project in your country. If you not aware of the productive can be improve by better planning. You may loss the opp. to improve your project’s profit margines. And your company may lost the next project while a international contractor wins the contract. If you ask the question why we are four times longer than the rest of the world then knowledge will arrive as you are seeking the answer and improvement will comes.

What I want to said is, look wider and wiser, we are always in the learning curves. As planner, our job is to plan the works ahead of us. If there is a better way of doing things, we should be the first one to seeking the knowledge.

Kind regards

Alex

Yes and No

IMO to some extends, Global benchmark of production rate and weighting is useful for planning a project. like hrs/m3 pour. hrs/meter lenght track install ...

Of course local knowledge need to be added to the equation in order to have a more realistic esimation. like, % of supervision, safety requirement, union requirement ...

I think this will work out a lot more accurate than pure local or pure global resource weighting/allocation.

Shahzad

If we plan the work only base on local rate/weighting, without compare the rest of the world, we will be like a fog in a deep well. Never open the eyes to the rest of the world.

Alex

Jolea

You are correct in saying that

"I think every country will have different productivity rates."

and this is the fact.

You cannot standardize the Resource weightage globally because Resource weightage depends upon different area conditions.

However, you can only standardize the resource locally not globally.

Robert

I think it is impossible to say that one country Productivity is higher than another.

I have work with most nationality’s and have found that it differ from person to person.

I am currently working on a Project in the UAE. The Construction site strenth is 1,200 people of which only 7 are Nationals. How will this effect your calculation.

In your experiance which is the less productive Nation/Country. I think you will not be able to find an answer to this.

I will speculate with a statement - the more developed a country is the lower the productivity due to the decrease in working hours and the increase in other interest. (Example internet).

Something to think about.

Robert, I think you are making some assumptions that may not prove valid.

Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems - eTaskMaker Project Planning Software

I think a nations work ethic is directly tied to its phase of development its hard to have a strong work ethic if your starving or your living in a hovel and had to learn any trade or skill on the streets or be indentured to a system that is corrupt.

Robert, the work ethic is not tangable or measurable, but the effect on productivity is. For example, I have seen welders from the USA, Venezuela, Phillipines, Turkey, etc. I can assure you that the average effiency/productivity between them for the same level of quality work is not nearly the same over the course of a day.

As far as the skill by skill comment, it was not clear from the conversation whether a global factor per region was being discussed or individual factors per skill per region.

Bernard Ertl
InterPlan Systems - eTaskMaker Project Planning Software

It seems to me that it is amost impossible to compare the rates of production in developed countries with those of countries that are still in the early stages of development with out using some kind of weighting. My thinking says to use the annual megawatt output for a country. i.e. the higher the megawatt output the less weighting the lower the megawatt output the higher the weighted score.

Hi to all
Iam sorry if iam interrupting your conversation and asking you
for the production rates which you had given on this site implies for 1.no resource or what? for my understanding plz clarify
1)plastering =2.1 m2/hr implies 1.no mason work done per hr or
2)plastering =2.1 m2/hr implies 1.no mason + 1.no labour work done per hr.
which of the above is true?
and how should i know the cycle
regards
mohsin farooqi

Hi there,

We are in the process (albeit slow) of uploading a much larger rates database that will hold rates from various contries of the world. We have 7,000+. The scripts should allow each of us members to add our own rates or flag up that certain rates are applicable to our home-country. Thereby creating a weighting factor.

We started to look at a simply country weighting factor (i.e. Singapore is 1.1 times China rates etc) but soon found that it did not work as when you look at two different activities from two countries, you see that the factor does not apply to all activities within a country, i.e. you would need a different factor for each type of installation activity. Hence it seemed easier to create various rates for various countries.

However, we have not rulled out showing country variences in terms of a weighting factor. This could still work, but we would need to develop the "master rates table" for a single "baseline" country (what would that be?) and create a factor against each of these rates for each contry. This could be done.

Volunteers are required from the group if this is to be moved forward quickly.

Regards.