Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we deliver the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Hammock, LOE, summary difference

5 replies [Last post]
Abbas Rajabpour
User offline. Last seen 15 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Oct 2022
Posts: 25
Groups: None
Can someone please clarify the difference between these three types of activities because I think they are representing the same goal. I have read alot but couldn't differ.

Replies

Patrick Weaver
User offline. Last seen 4 days 8 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2001
Posts: 384
Groups: None

Summary Activities, LOE and Hammocks are distinctly different activity types; each has its advantages and limitations and very few tools correctly implement all three types.  A full explanation is in this paper: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/Mag_Articles/P016_Hammocks_LOE_and_Summary_Activities.pdf

Patrick Weaver
User offline. Last seen 4 days 8 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2001
Posts: 384
Groups: None

Summary Activities, LOE and Hammocks are distinctly different activity types; each has its advantages and limitations and very few tools correctly implement all three types.  A full explanation is in this paper: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/Mag_Articles/P016_Hammocks_LOE_and_Summary_Activities.pdf

Abbas Rajabpour
User offline. Last seen 15 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Oct 2022
Posts: 25
Groups: None

Thanks David for your reply, I am preparing myself for PMI-SP exam and in the course that I took, it was talking about these three different activities:

SUMMARY ACTIVITY

LEVEL OF EFFORT

HAMMOCK

I understand the meaning of each of them, but they seem to be different to use. Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on this.

david kelly
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 39
Groups: None
Abbas, Because of your use of the term LOE, I presume this is a P6 query, although posted in a general forum. Level of Effort (LoE) was originally a terminology used by NASA, and the team that wrote P6 in the late 20th century seems to have worked for NASA and only ever user Microsoft Project. ‘Most’ of us still call them Hammocks. P6, in my opinion, remains a terrific piece of late 20th century software. Both LoE and WBS summary activities in P6 can have no schedule impact. WBS Summary activities are like hammocks, except they require no relationships, and will ignore them if they are present. The dates normally calculated for each activity are ignored, and a summary of the dates of every activity that shares the same WBS code is used. My most common use for them is to spread undifferentiated costs from a financial system (eg SAP) across all of the activities that share a WBS code. LoE activities use the relationships that bind them to the plan to calculate dates and durations. The relationship types that can be used are subject to extraordinary rules when the LoE activities are ‘nested’. I did have the rules for this written down 10 or 15 years ago, but cannot find them. My own choice is to use only Start to Start and Finish to Finish relationships to keep things ‘simple’ for me, but almost everything is allowed (and probably should not be). P6 is VERY poor at relationship-centric reporting.
david kelly
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Posts: 39
Groups: None
Abbas, Because of your use of the term LOE, I presume this is a P6 query, although posted in a general forum. Level of Effort (LoE) was originally a terminology used by NASA, and the team that wrote P6 in the late 20th century seems to have worked for NASA and only ever user Microsoft Project. ‘Most’ of us still call them Hammocks. P6, in my opinion, remains a terrific piece of late 20th century software. Both LoE and WBS summary activities in P6 can have no schedule impact. WBS Summary activities are like hammocks, except they require no relationships, and will ignore them if they are present. The dates normally calculated for each activity are ignored, and a summary of the dates of every activity that shares the same WBS code is used. My most common use for them is to spread undifferentiated costs from a financial system (eg SAP) across all of the activities that share a WBS code. LoE activities use the relationships that bind them to the plan to calculate dates and durations. The relationship types that can be used are subject to extraordinary rules when the LoE activities are ‘nested’. I did have the rules for this written down 10 or 15 years ago, but cannot find them. My own choice is to use only Start to Start and Finish to Finish relationships to keep things ‘simple’ for me, but almost everything is allowed (and probably should not be). P6 is VERY poor at relationship-centric reporting.