After a number of years working in Project Controls, and several organisations, I can get my head around Planning and Resources but what i see constant in-fighting, division and confusion around is just how Actual Costs and how actual costs are aligned to the Schedule and with figures from Finance/Cost Control (and the age old Cost Control vs Earned Value/Schedule and Cost misalignment has happened in every organisation I've encountered). So my question to the good people of Planning Planet is this:
What is the one (or best working) way that you have encountered that Actuals should be interepreted and implemented in P6 or should it be outside of P6 and no Actual Costs and hours entered into P6??
- Does a WBS ever match a CBS? Has this happened? how does this take place? Does it have to match??
- Are the actuals entered by the Scheduer/Planner? Should they be?
- How should Cost and Schedule be aligned?
- Does the Actuals match the WBS and activity 1:1?
- How are actuals handled by Planning and Scheduling?
- Entered manually by the Scheduler?
- No actuals , only % complete, (and dates, remaining labor/material units) entered and then exported ourside of P6 and compared against a spreadsheet with weightings against activities and values?
- A dedicated Cost processor (Deltek, SAP, Unifier (has Unifier ever been proven?))?
I would love to hear the best working example of these as it has long confused me.
Thank you so much :)
Replies