Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

NEC Option C Contract

5 replies [Last post]
Mike Procter
User offline. Last seen 13 years 49 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Groups: None

Hi Guys,

Think I may be stuck and will lose thousands of pounds, working on building a new carpark in Scotland, we agreed with the company to do this under NEC3 OPtion C Target Contract with a activity schedule.

However during the earth works we came accross some buried concrete slabs, at first we thought not a problem, just get them shifted, then we noticed that we were working on a former graveyard.

The work has now stopped, and the client is now saying that I am responsible for the removal of this, can anyone advise on what I can do? I dont know much about law and it seems like they knew it was there but wont admit it.

If it is me who is responsible for the removal of this, I will make a loss on this one, any help would be appreciated.

Replies

Mike Procter
User offline. Last seen 13 years 49 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Groups: None

HI,

Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts? 

Mike Procter
User offline. Last seen 13 years 49 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Groups: None
 
Mike Procter
User offline. Last seen 13 years 49 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Groups: None

HI,

Does anyone know of a case that has been heard in court regarding unforseen ground conditions under NEC3 contracts?

Damian Smith
User offline. Last seen 4 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 12

Mike P

Sounds to me like it is a compensation event or at least should be, in which case the target cost should change as a result.

Also, take a look at the client specified risks, because if they are listed then you should be paid for them if they become reality.

If you like, please let me know your email and I will get you to send me the documents so I can review it.

Sounds like you need to action this quickly as it seems very unfair.

Mike Testro
User offline. Last seen 33 weeks 6 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 4418

Hi Mike

I just googled this on NEC3 Option C

Option C: Target Cost contract with activity schedule

In this option the Contractor tenders (or negotiates) a target price using an activity schedule. Each

activity is priced as a lump sum and a Fee is also tendered as a percentage for subcontract work and

for the Contractor’s own direct work. The initial target price is the sum of the activity prices and the

fee. During the course of the contract, the target price is adjusted to cater for compensation events

that are set out in the contract.

Payment is made on the basis of actual costs with an incentive mechanism for the Contractor to

minimise costs. Savings and over-runs are shared between the parties. The sharing of risk in the

target cost approach is likely to reduce the occurrence of disputes.

If these gravestones are a compensation event then you should apply for it soonest.

It seems that the initial target price is adjusted on that basis.

Unless you have accepted all underground risks.

Look at clauses 60.1 (7) and (12)

Best regards

Mike Testro