Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

RE: P3e/c 3.5.1 user satisfaction

1 reply [Last post]
Tue, 2004-04-20 21:01
Forum Guest
User offline. Last seen 17 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Groups: None
Definitivelly P3e and the cosmetic brother P3e/c were not developed by the same team that developed old reliable P3.

I am very dissapointed with P3e and most probably would be with P3e/c. I have the same + many more complaints.

Of course those with Primavera interest will say the contrary.

Heard of version 5, version 4 is no good.
Top

Replies

Fri, 2004-04-30 02:34
#1
Ger McSweeney
User offline. Last seen 9 years 3 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 6
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
Very frustrated with P3e/c. I have being working with P3 3.1 for the past 5 years and this is the first bit of exposure of P3e/c and i’m not impressed. They seem to have forgotten to keep/improve the user friendly side of things. Your list below is your the tip of the iceberg.
The big downside for me is the reporting (maybe i haven’t given it enough time!)

Regards,
Ger
Top